Where Poor Children Live

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The popular image that poor children all live in broken homes in inner-city ghettos is a wrong one, according to a recent analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data by a team of Harvard University professors.

Writing in the Sept. 8 issue of Science, Mary Jo Bane and David T. Ellwood of the university's John F. Kennedy School of Government report that the majority of children in families whose incomes fall below the federal poverty level "do not exhibit the characteristics most people associate with the underclass."

Instead, they write, throughout the 1980's, roughly half of the nation's poor children lived in two-parent homes (see chart). And about 45 percent of those households had at least one full-time wage earner.

In addition, in 1987 almost 30 percent of poor children lived in rural areas, and 28 percent lived in the suburbs. Data from 1980 show that fewer than 9 percent of poor children lived in the kind of high-poverty, inner-city slums that capture media attention, the authors state.

The authors conclude that poverty does not reflect deviant behavior by a minority in society, but rather is a reflection of the economic and social changes that affect all levels of American society.

Vol. 09, Issue 13

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories