E.D. Reportedly Seeking More Money for Centers

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--In response to demands that Education Department research centers focusing on organizational issues at different levels of schooling be retained, the department is seeking ways to expand the amount of money available to finance its centers, sources in the office of educational research and improvement said last week.

In its proposal earlier this fall to award grants for 12 research centers, the department included no "mission" description similar to those of two popular current centers--one that studies issues related to the organization of elementary and middle schools and one dealing with secondary schools. (See Education Week, Sept. 20, 1989.)

Retention of those centers was overwhelmingly supported in letters to the agency and in testimony at a Congressional hearing last month. Department officials are to appear this week at a second hearing on the proposal.

One agency source said o.e.r.i. officials hope to "expand the pie" of available funding by seeking cooperative agreements with other agencies and other divisions of the Education Department for the support of some centers.

In addition to seeking arrangements that would allow funding for the school-organization centers, the department is seriously weighing demands that it finance a center on language-minority issues, the source said, adding that the oeri might seek some bilingual-education money for that effort.

"We can't ignore the volume" of negative comments on the research-center proposal from members of the Congress and the public, a second source said. The source noted that good relations with Capitol Hill are especially important if the agency is to receive sufficient appropriations to support the centers.

Two influential lawmakers supported the school-organization centers and a language-minority center in their comments on the department's plan, and demanded that all centers address the need "to better educate the increasing percentage of our nation's students who leave school with inadequate skills to prepare them for work in the 21st century."

In a joint letter, two Democratic Representatives--Augustus F. Hawkins of California, chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, and Major R. Owens of New York, chairman of its Subcommittee on Select Education--also said the o.e.r.i. plan places an "unacceptable" emphasis on parental choice.

Offering parents a choice in selecting their children's schools "is a decision that is firmly within the realm of state and local governance," they wrote. "Research on choice is only relevant as a subject of federally sponsored research and development insofar as there is a need to monitor its implementation."

The lawmakers said they feared that such research would be slanted toward a "right-wing point of view," and that researchers would be "too intimidated" to report results that "are not found to be consistent with the ideological hysteria" of the Bush Administration on the issue.

The Administration has made support for choice a cornerstone of its education program, while Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Owens have been among the strongest critics of the idea, arguing that it will help only elite students and schools.

Parental choice is mentioned in mission descriptions of three proposed centers. Centers on family, community, and young children's learning and on education in the inner cities are to focus partly on "home, family, cultural, and community influences on education, including parental choice and involvement in schooling."

Choice is also listed as one of several "policy approaches" that could be studied by the center on education policy, along with raising student and teacher standards and site-based management of schools.

In their final comment, Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Owens called the proposed omission of a center on postsecondary governance and finance "a clear circumvention of Congressional intent." They called for research on financial aid and minorities in higher education.

Vol. 09, Issue 11

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >