California Science Framework Stressing Evolution Adopted

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

After making what supporters of creationism called "cosmetic changes," the California Board of Education last week unanimously approved a curricular framework for science that includes evolution as a key theme of instruction.

The 187-page document, which is expected to guide the selection of textbooks in the largest state, had won praise from science educators and civil libertarians for its emphasis on evolution, as well as for its approach to teaching.

Unlike much current science instruction, the framework, which was approved by the board's curriculum commission in September, is organized by themes, rather than specific topics. Such an approach, commission members said, would encourage teachers to focus on the connections between science disciplines and reduce the emphasis on memorizing discrete facts.

In adopting the document, the board approved without comment the new approach. However, it agreed to delete three passages the commission had included to explain its emphasis on evolution.

A statement that "there is no scientific dispute that evolution has occurred and continues to occur; this is why evolution is regarded as a scientific fact."

A description of a National Academy of Sciences report on evolution and creationism, and the U.S. Supreme Court's 1987 ruling overturning a Louisiana law mandating the teaching of creationism.

Beverly Sheldon, director of research for the Traditional Values Coalition, an Anaheim-based group that claims to represent 6,000 churches statewide, called the changes "cosmetic," and predicted that supporters of creationism will take the board to court for violating the state's policy against "dogmatism" in science instruction.

"They were told to remove references to teaching evolution as fact,'' Ms. Sheldon said. "They deleted a sentence from the introduction, but left in place all the examples of evolution as fact."

The board's action, she said, will move teachers "further from realizing their constitutional right to teach alternative theories if they choose to."

But Eugenie C. Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education Inc., a group in Berkeley that advocates the teaching of evolution, countered that the board's action will ensure good science teaching in the state.

"I'll take 98 percent of a loaf, and forgo the other 2 percent, if the alternative is not having a strong scientific and educational document," she said.

"A slice was taken off" the loaf, Ms. Scott added. "It looks funny, but it's still nutritious."

Michael Hudson, Western director of People for the American Way, a civil-liberties group, was less sanguine about the board's actions. The changes, he said, leave open the possibility that publishers and teachers could downplay the importance of evolution in science teaching.

"The state board had the chance to slam the door on the creationism-evolution debate," he said. "Unfortunately, they left it ajar."

"The question is," he added, "will those changes be an invitation to publishers to weaken coverage of evolution in their textbooks?"

Vol. 09, Issue 11

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >