Kentucky Task Force Still Unclear on Reform Goals

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Nearly five months after the Kentucky Supreme Court ordered a complete restructuring of all aspects of the state's school system, reform efforts have yet to move beyond the stage of deciding on the process for achieving the changes.

The Task Force on Education Reform, a panel composed of legislators and representatives of the governor's office, has held a number of meetings to lay the groundwork for its mission.

But sources in the state say that, so far, no definite blueprint for a revamped school system has been forthcoming.

"A grand design has been slow to emerge," said Robert F. Sexton, executive director of the Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence, a citizens' advocacy group.

Many legislators are still trying to define the job at hand. Vic Hellard and Thomas Dorman, the task force's coordinators, have asked the state attorney general's office for an opinion on whether the court's sweeping decision will require the legislature to repeal and then re-enact those education-related laws it may want to keep.

The supreme court's ruling "strongly suggests" that such action would be necessary, Mr. Hellard and Mr. Dorman said in a letter to Attorney General Frederic Cowan. Several hundred laws touching on Kentucky's schools may be involved.

When the decision was handed down, Chief Justice Robert F. Stephens wrote that the court was invalidating "the statutory system as a whole." The court did not identify specific laws.

Mr. Hellard and Mr. Dorman asked the attorney general to identify which laws pertaining to state4schools were declared by the court to be unconstitutional.

All laws that have been struck down must be identified before the task force can develop, and the legislature can enact, a constitutional system of schools, Mr. Hellard and Mr. Dorman argued.

The court recently clarified several issues raised by its decision and extended the legislature's deadline for rebuilding the school system from the end of the regular 1990 legislative session to mid-July of next year.

But in the letter, Mr. Hellard and Mr. Dorman argued that several points in the court's opinion "remain less than clear." Those questions, they said, involve interpretation of the decision, not rereview by the supreme court.

Also, responding to pressure from civil-rights leaders who complained the task force had no minority representation, Joan Taylor, who is black, was invited to join the panel.

Ms. Taylor is Gov. Wallace G. Wilkinson's liaison for the Cabinet for Human Resources.

Appointed School Chief

Meanwhile, the joint interim committee on elections and constitutional amendments has prefiled a bill for the 1990 regular session that represents a new attempt to change the state superintendent's position from an elected position to an appointed one.

The bill would create a new state school board that would hire the superintendent. The idea is different from one voters rejected in 1986 because a majority of the 13-member state board would be elected.

The state board currently is appointed by the governor withoutconfirmation by the legislature.

Under the committee's plan, the governor would appoint six board members with the approval of both the House and Senate, while seven members--one representing each of the state's Congressional districts--would be elected.

The newly configured board would gain the power to hire the state superintendent.

An appointed superintendent has been advocated for several years in Kentucky as a way to provide continuity to the school system and to stem political influence. But voters have repeatedly rejected the idea.

Legislators on the committee said they hope voters will be more willing to accept an appointed state superintendent in exchange for an opportunity to elect state school board members who can influence the selection.

Vol. 09, Issue 08

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >