Critic Requests F.T.C. Probe of Test Publishers

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

John Jacob Cannell, the physician who revealed that the vast majority of pupils score above average on standardized achievement tests, has asked federal and state authorities to investigate whether leading test publishers engage in "unfair and deceptive trade practices."

In letters sent late last month, Dr. Cannell, a New Mexico psychiatrist and president of Friends for Education Inc., a watchdog group, asked the Federal Trade Commission and the 50 state attorneys general to investigate the development, promotion, sale, and use of the tests.

In addition, he wrote to Secretary of Education Lauro F. Cavazos, requesting that the Education Department ask the publishers to comply with a set of guidelines "designed to assure that the selection, use, and reporting of norm-referenced achievement tests by America's public schools will not misrepresent achievement gains, leave false impressions of relative achievement, or otherwise deceive the American public."

Six Tests Cited

In his letters, Dr. Cannell cites the California Achievement Test and the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills, sold by ctb/McGraw-Hill; the Stanford Achievement Test and the Metropolitan Achievement Test, sold by the Psychological Corporation; the Iowa Test of Basic Skills, sold by the Riverside Publishing Company; and the Science Research Associates test, sold by Science Research Associates.

The McGraw-Hill tests and the sra exam are now published by the Chicago-based Macmillan/McGraw-Hill School Publishing Company.

These firms deceive the public, Dr. Cannell charges in the letters, because most students score "above average" on the tests, and because the publishers "have not taken even the most basic security precautions with their product."

In a report issued last month, Dr. Cannell found that 48 of the 50 states report scores above the national average. He charged that the high scores have come about because educators "cheat" by allowing teachers to see test items and teach them to their pupils.

Paul L. Williams, director of research for ctb/McGraw-Hill, noted that Dr. Cannell filed similar consumer-fraud complaints against test publishers in 1988, and that no action had been taken.

He added that schools share responsibility in ensuring that tests are secure and that teachers do not teach test items to students to inflate average scores.

"All of us agree, and want to support, more security," Mr. Williams said. "We have to look at where it leaves our purview and enters the purview of local education agencies."

Vol. 09, Issue 06

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >