Senate Approves Weakened Version of Anti-Drug Bill

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--The Senate late last week approved an omnibus drug bill that would weaken the measure it passed last month requiring schools to have tough anti-drug policies to receive federal funds.

The final bill includes an amendment that would require the Secretary of Education to waive sanctions for up to one year for state education agencies in the process of implementing a statewide anti-drug plan.

This would have the practical effect, observers said, of also waiving the sanctions--including the cutoff of federal funds--for schools in those states that have not implemented such a policy.

President's Plan Modified

The modification was one of more than 30 amendments to President Bush's legislative proposal for implementing his national drug strategy that was consid4ered by the Senate.

In September, the Senate agreed to amend the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1986 to require all schools, as a prerequisite to receiving federal funds, to certify to state education officials that they have implemented a program to prevent the use of drugs and alcohol by students and employees on school grounds or at school-sponsored activities.

That measure was included as part of a $9.4-billion bipartisan budget agreement to finance the nation8al drug strategy unveiled by the President Sept. 5. (See Education Week, Oct. 4, 1989.)

The amendment passed last week, however, would weaken the earlier measure. It would allow schools to continue receiving federal funds if they certify to state authorities that they have "a plan with a timetable to implement" an anti-drug program.

The plan would have to include alternative support, education, and re-entry programs for students expelled because they violated the school's drug policy.

Schools that do not already provide anti-drug education for students in grades 4-9 would be required, under the amendment, to use any new federal anti-drug monies they receive for this population.

More Aid for Cities

State education agencies would also be required to give more federal drug money to the districts serving the largest city in the state.

An aide to Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, who sponsored the amendment, said the measure adopted last month would be "incredibly onerous" for educators. The Kennedy amendment would give educators at both the district and state level more time to implement anti-drug policies, the aide said.

Other Amendments

Other amendments to the drug bill would:

  • Direct the National Drug Control Policy office to develop a coordinated policy with state and local governments to curb youth-gang involvement in the drug trade. The plan would have to be implemented by February 1991.
  • Allow states to include the cost of drug-treatment programs in their Medicaid program.
  • Allow states to use federal funds from the Drug-Free Schools program for initiatives aimed at latchkey children. A recent study found that latchkey children were morelikely to use drugs than children who have adult supervision before or after school. (See Education Week, Sept. 13, 1989.)
  • Permit local governments to use federal drug-education money for model alternative schools for youths with drug problems. This proposal was included in the President's drug plan, and the Education Department has said it may use existing monies to pay for between 5 and 20 model programs. (See Education Week, Sept. 13, 1989.)
  • Encourage states to develop so-called "boot camp" programs for first-time drug offenders.
  • Authorize $10 million for a grant program for schools wanting to establish a Project Drug Abuse Resistance Education program for students in grades K-6. Project dare, which began in Los Angeles, uses law-enforcement officials to explain the dangers of drug use to schoolchildren.

The omnibus measure does not appropriate any new funds for these programs. The House has not yet begun to consider its own drug bill.

Vol. 09, Issue 06

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >