Draft Pennsylvania Rules Require Aid For All Pupils With Learning Problems

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Pennsylvania schools would have to provide special help to all students with learning problems, even if they were not legally classified as "handicapped," under new special-education rules currently being considered by the state school board.

The proposed regulations would require schools to set up an "instructional support team" for each student who is determined to be having difficulty in learning.

Composed of the school principal, the student's teachers, and other support personnel, the team would meet to discuss the student's learning problems and come up with a strategy to help him or her succeed in school. If the intervention was considered after 30 days to have failed, the student would be referred to the special-education system for a formal evaluation.

"Right now, we have a lot of students who aren't handicapped but who are having trouble and who get referred to special education because nothing informal is available," said Robert Feir, executive director of the state board.

"This will allow us to intervene earlier and more appropriately without a formal and expensive evaluation process," he argued.

"The concept is to give students instructional interventions that would help kids succeed in the regular classroom, so they don't have to be put in the special-education stream," explained Nicholas Panagoplos, who is chairman of the board subcommittee that is developing the rules.

If the draft regulations are adopted, Pennsylvania would be among only a handful of states to employ this kind of intervention strategy, according to state officials.

The proposed rule has received backing from state groups representing disabled students and their parents.

It has stirred controversy among school administrators, however, who warn that the new mandate would put a heavy financial burden on local districts.

"We're concerned that school districts are going to wind up picking up the tab for a lot of the extra costs involved in this," said Thomas Gentzel, president of the Pennsylvania School Boards Association.

"We find it ironic that regulations that were intended to get costs under control are going to increase costs substantially," he added.

The legislature this year mandated the effort to revise the special-education rules, in the wake of a public furor over a mounting deficit in the state special-education budget. (See Education Week, June 14, 1989.)

Lawmakers this summer appropriated $99 million to pay off the entire debt. Under the existing special-education rules, however, the shortfall has continued to mount.

By the end of this fiscal year, the deficit is expected to reach $60 million, Mr. Panagoplos said.

To keep the financial crisis from getting worse, the legislature asked the board to "speed up" its timetable for revising special-education rules, with the goal of having the new regulations in place by January.

The effort represents the first major revision of the state's special-education programs in 14 years.

The officials developing the new rules acknowledge that the "instructional support team" concept will be expensive at first.

Over the long term, however, the strategy will result in savings because fewer students will be placed in special-education programs, the officials maintain.

The additional paperwork involved in the new procedure will be minimal, they say, because the teams will only be required to complete a single-page report on each student.

A key to making the new intervention successful, architects of the proposal argue, is to ensure that the new teams do not become "a mirror image" of the formal, multidisciplinary teams that are now required by federal law to meet and develop an "individualized education plan'' for every special-education student.

"Then it would become just another hoop to jump through," Mr. Feir said.

The draft regulations contain a number of other innovative proposals as well.

They seek, for example, to eliminate the common use of stigmatizing labels, such as "educable mentally retarded" or "learning disabled,'' to describe a student's handicapping condition.

Instead, students would be labeled only as being "eligible" for special-education services. And their individualized education plans would reflect "learning goals" specific to their needs.

The board is scheduled to review the draft proposal at its Nov. 9 meeting.

Vol. 09, Issue 05

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >