Chicago Settles Spec.-Ed. Dispute

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The Chicago school board has agreed to hire hundreds of additional teachers and other employees in order to end a four-year dispute with the U.S. Education Department over the quality of the school system's services for handicapped pupils.

In addition to requiring more spending for special-education programs, the agreement reached in late July between the district and the federal agency calls for the timely and appropriate placement of some 3,500 students who are awaiting spaces in special-education classes. At least 4,000 of the district's 410,000 students are classified as in need of special-education services.

Failure to reach a settlement would have cost the district $4 million in federal aid to magnet schools as well as more than $100 million annually in aid for other programs.

The school board will have to increase its budget by $4.4 million to carry out the plan, according to Bob Saigh, a spokesman for the district.

Under the terms of the agreement, educational services for handicapped children will be spread throughout the district's 600 schools rather than being concentrated in three buildings, as they currently are.

The school board also agreed to hire 350 new special-education employees, including 68 psychologists, 73 guidance counselors, 100 teachers, and 100 teacher's aides.

And the board agreed to create a new associate superintendent's position to oversee the special-education program.

The agreement appears to lay to rest a dispute that began in December 1984 when the Education Department's civil-rights office told the board that it was investigating the district's evaluation and placement of handicapped children. An administrative-law judge ruled last August that the existing special-education system discriminated against handicapped and learning-disabled children.--pw

Vol. 08, Issue 40

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >