Most Public Schools Met Asbestos Deadline, Surveys Find

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--The vast majority of public schools were able to meet federal deadlines for inspecting for asbestos and submitting management plans to state officials, two independent surveys have found.

Federal law required all schools to carry out both tasks by Oct. 12, 1988. Those that were unable to meet the deadline after a "good faith" effort were allowed to apply for a deferral extending until May 9 of this year.

A survey of officials in 36 states and the District of Columbia by Kaselaan and D'Angelo Associates, a national asbestos-consulting firm, showed that more than 95 percent of school districts had met all the requirements by the May deadline.

In seven states, the survey found, all public and private schools had satisfied the requirements in time.

The District of Columbia, where only 66 percent of schools met the deadline, had the lowest compliance rate.

Officials of the Environmental Protection Agency said in May that most of the schools that were unable to abide by the law were small, private institutions. (See Education Week, May 31, 1989.)

About a third of state officials surveyed said they expected to disapprove a substantial percentage of the management plans submitted. Under federal law, state officials have 90 days to review and reject management plans.

In a second study, by the National School Boards Association, 98 percent of the districts responding had submitted either a management plan or a deferral request by the October deadline.

That study also indicated that schools expect to spend far more on asbestos-related activities than the epa has predicted. The survey found that the 671 responding districts expect to spend $464 million on these activities by April 1990. At that rate, the nsba estimated, all schools would spend a total of $6 billion--double the agency's estimate--to comply with the law.

Asbestos Bill Stalled

Meanwhile, a bill that would require asbestos consultants to proel15lvide financial assurances for any liability resulting from their work and would raise standards for becoming a consultant, is languishing in a House subcommittee.

The bill, which also would extend most of the federal asbestos rules for schools to public and commercial buildings, will probably not see any action until September, according to an aide to Representative James J. Florio, the New Jersey Democrat who sponsored the legislation.

The epa is expected at that time to announce whether it will develop regulations for other structures without a Congressional mandate, the aide noted. If the agency goes ahead with that effort, the legislation may be altered or dropped, the aide said.

The epa also is planning to begin in the fall an evaluation of the effectiveness of the federal asbestos law. In a 1988 report to the Congress on asbestos in public and commercial buildings, the agency promised to complete that inquiry by February 1991.

The agency said in a document released for comment last month that it will conduct six studies of different aspects of the law, at a total cost of about $1 million.

The document indicated that the studies would include asbestos reinspections at approximately 200 schools, an evaluation of the quality of schools' management plans, and studies to determine whether school personnel have been properly trained to work with asbestos and if abatement activities have been done correctly.--ef

Vol. 08, Issue 40

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >