Teachers in San Francisco Pick The A.F.T. as Bargaining Agent

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

After an eight-year battle, the San Francisco-American Federation of Teachers union succeeded May 26 in wresting the right to represent the city's teachers from the San Francisco Classroom Teachers Association.

In the fourth decertification election in eight years, the sf-aft defeated the National Education Association affiliate by 300 votes. The margin of victory for the latter in the 1983 and 1986 elections had been fewer than 100 votes.

Of 3,866 eligible voters, 3,141 cast mail-in ballots--1,703 for the sf-aft, 1,388 for the sfcta, and 50 for "no representation," according to the California Public Employment Relations Board.

"This is a mandate, in my mind," said Carolyn Doggett, who organized the sfcta's campaign. "It was a clear tidal wave."

"Teachers want a greater voice in what is going on," said Norman K. Holsinger, coordinator of the sf-aft's campaign. "They felt the current bargaining agent had failed in that leadership."

The sf-aft attempted to make reform issues a central part of its campaign, calling for democratically elected teacher councils in each school. The sfcta ran on its record, touting pay hikes totaling 84 percent since it became bargaining agent in 1981.

Ms. Doggett attributed the loss to "overall bad conditions in an urban setting" that have created intense dissatisfaction among the city's teachers.

"When you're dissatisfied, you look at someone else," she said.

Albert Shanker, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said the election would enable the aft, which also represents San Francisco's paraprofessionals and school-related personnel, to "move forward to make the public schools a model for both California and the nation."--ab

Vol. 08, Issue 37

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >