Open-Enrollment Option Is Approved in Nebraska

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Gov. Kay A. Orr of Nebraska signed legislation last week that will allow students to transfer to schools outside of their home districts beginning in the 1990-91 school year.

The open-enrollment bill was passed by the unicameral legislature by a vote of 27 to 20 despite the opposition from school administrators and rural districts.

The bill's chief sponsor, Senator Dennis G. Baack, expressed surprise that the legislature cleared the measure in the first year it was up for consideration. He said its critics may have been placated by provisions calling for the program to be phased in gradually and fine-tuned in future legislative sessions.

According to Mr. Baack, in speeches on the chamber's floor, even opponents of the bill "would get up and say they liked choice, but they just felt we were moving too fast."

Fourth in Nation

Passage of the measure makes Nebraska the fourth state to adopt a statewide open-enrollment program. Minnesota established the nation's first last year, and similar programs were approved earlier this year in Iowa and Arkansas.

Under the Nebraska bill, districts can accept transfer students on a voluntary basis during the program's first three years.

All districts will have the option to prohibit students from transferring in the programs's first year. In the second year, they may limit transfers to 5 percent of their enroll4ment, and in the third year to 10 percent of their enrollment. All limits on incoming and outgoing students will end in the program's fourth year.

James P. Havelka, president of the Nebraska Rural Community Schools Association, said members of his organization opposed the measure because they feared it would jeopardize cooperative efforts between rural districts.

Rural Concerns

He also said rural educators felt the bill would simply redistribute state aid among districts without addressing the fact "that we do not have sufficient resources for our educational system as a whole."

Mr. Havelka said his organization ceased to lobby actively against the measure after its sponsors amended it to limit the financial strain on systems that will lose students.

That change, however, did not placate all of the bill's critics.

Senator Howard A. Lamb, for example, predicted the program eventually will have "a drastic effect" on local school budgets.

Districts that accept new students will not have enough money to cover the additional costs of educating8them, he said, and districts that lose students will not have enough money to cover fixed costs that will remain after students leave.

Senator Lamb also said the measure includes no method for determining the motives behind transfer decisions.

"As it stands right now, the parent or guardian can choose any reason and there is no body, no group, no person who makes a judgment as to whether or not it is a valid reason to change schools," he said.

Restructuring Bill Approved

In other action, the legislature approved a bill appropriating $200,000 to be distributed in grants to districts that locally develop plans to restructure schools.

Under the bill, the state will hold local and statewide forums to discuss restructuring initiatives such as public-private partnerships, citizen programs, and cooperative efforts between agencies.

Beginning in the 1990-91 school year, a commission representing the state, local school boards, administrators, and teachers will award incentive grants of up to $40,000 to districts to finance their restructuring plans. The program will be administered by the state department of education.

Vol. 08, Issue 36

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >