Texas Education Schools May Lose Accreditation

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Eighteen teacher-training programs in Texas are at risk of losing their national accreditation because of restrictions placed on them by state legislative and regulatory bodies.

In a unanimous vote on May 12, the executive board of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education decided that "compelling reasons" exist for examining the status of the Texas programs.

The board's action was in response to a complaint filed against 26 Texas institutions by Hendrik D. Gideonse, professor of education and policy science at the University of Cincinnati. (See Education Week, March 15, 1989.)

In his complaint, Mr. Gideonse charged that the programs were prevented from exercising "self-governance" because of a Texas law that bars them from requiring students to take more than 18 hours of professional education at the undergraduate level in order to be certified.

Such autonomy is required under ncate accreditation standards.

Mr. Gideonse's action represents the first time that ncate's complaint process has been used against a group of institutions affected by state policies beyond their control.

Ncate certifies schools, colleges, and departments of education nationwide.

In making its decision, the ncate board decided to limit the complaint to public institutions only. It will not pursue Mr. Gideonse's complaint against eight private higher-education programs in the state.

The decision cited the combined impact of the 1986 law and subsequent regulations issued by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, which oversees the state's public colleges and universities.

Rules handed down by the coordinating board have gone well beyond the legislature's mandates, according to teacher educators.

In most instances, the new rules prevent public teacher-training programs from offering graduate-level professional education beyond the 18-hour limit.

Even institutions that gain permission to offer graduate programs must continue to offer a parallel, undergraduate track that permits students to become certified in the minimal amount of time.

According to Richard C. Kunkel, executive director of ncate, it is the "joint restrictive effect" of the law and the regulations that sets Texas' policies apart from those of other states that have attempted to impose some limits on the amount of teachers' professional training.

Eugene Eubanks, a member of the ncate board, said the panel's decision to pursue the complaint represented the "first time the profession, acting through its accrediting body, has made such a strong statement against intrusion in professional matters."

The complaint will be forwarded to ncate's unit-accreditation board, which will meet in September to determine the next steps in the complaint procedure.

The 18 institutions affected are: East Texas State University, Lamar University, Midwestern State University, North Texas State University, Prairie View A&M University, Sam Houston State University, Southwest Texas State University, Stephen F. Austin State University, Tarleton State University, Texas A&M University at College Station, Texas A&M University at Kingsville, Texas Southern University, Texas Tech University, the University of Houston, the University of Houston at Clear Lake City, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Texas at El Paso, and West Texas State University.


Vol. 08, Issue 35

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >