Letters to the Editor

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Ruth E. Randall Commissioner of Education Minnesota Department of Education St. Paul, Minn.

Your recent article on open enrollment in Minnesota attributes some local school-district problems to open enrollment ("In Nation's First Open-Enrollment State, the Action Begins," March 15, 1989).

I would like to offer some clarifying insights on the story.

In regard to the Mountain Iron-Buhl district and the perceived negative impact of open enrollment, it should be noted that:

In 1985, the Mountain Iron and Buhl school districts were consolidated.

The consolidated district has had financial problems from its inception.

School-closing decisions in 1988 created a high level of citizen irritation.

By September 1988, more than 70 resident pupils had chosen to enroll in a neighboring district without open-enrollment-type authorization. They simply left the district.

Throughout the 1988-89 school year, the school board has been attempting to create a greater degree of stability. Financial problems and school-closing issues continue to cast a cloud over the district. A referendum to secure additional tax support is scheduled for April 18.

It is in the foregoing context that many parents and pupils are seeking educational stability outside the district.

For them, mandatory school-district participation in open enrollment for 1988-89 is merely a fortuitous happenstance providing a vehicle through which they can intensify their voice of displeasure with the consolidated Mountain Iron-Buhl district.

The problems of this district were manifest considerably before the advent of open enrollment, and therefore open enrollment should not be labeled as their cause.

Thank you for providing a national forum through which Minnesota's reform efforts can be highlighted and disseminated.

B. Juan de Jesus Chula Vista, Calif.

I couldn't help but get a chuckle from reading "Perspectives on Public-School 'Choice"' (Commentary, April 19, 1989).

I don't know about suburban parents, but I'm sure that inner-city parents would send their chil4dren to the neighborhood Catholic school if they had the "choice" to do so, regardless of how many hundreds of options the public schools create.

Instead of creating more options that have dropouts, low achievement, drug use, and other problems as the end result, why not design schools based on a model that research has proven gives positive results? That model is Catholic schools.

Who are we trying to kid? Our public schools, on the whole, are a mess, and these "alternative choices" are only making them worse.

Let's accept the reality and get to work.

Suzanne A. Cornelisse Student, Elementary Education University of Montana Missoula, Mont.

I applaud Gerald W. Bracey's stand against the basic-skills approach in teaching and testing, especially in relation to language-development skills ("Advocates of Basic Skills 'Know What Ain't So,"' Commentary, April 5, 1989).

I have an additional query for the advocates of basic skills: How does one explain children's learning to speak language?

Is there someone who breaks down the speaking process into chunks for them, or drills them in how to construct sentences?

Research has shown that children's minds are constantly at work, sorting and organizing in an attempt to make some sense of their world.

What is frightening is that educators can stifle that working, seeking mind simply by assuming children know nothing except what educators can teach them!

When we assume that children are void of mental adroitness, aren't we shutting down the greatest technology in the world--the human mind?

It's not surprising that higher-order thinking skills are low in students, because children's minds often are stifled in early years of schooling.

Educators should base selection of curricula and teaching strategies on a sound rationale--one that considers what children can do with their inborn technologies.

Vol. 08, Issue 33

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >