Public Boarding Schools for Gifted Deserve Support

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

It is hard to understand why proposals for public boarding schools for high-school students gifted in mathematics and science continue in many states to encounter vociferous opposition--or even mild indifference.

Already in place in six states--Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas--such schools have been quietly going about their business with major success. Given the unsettling reports and staggering statistics about the deficiencies of American education in mathematics and science, the nation sorely needs schools that nurture talents in these fields. And these programs also hold the promise of improving the quality of teaching and learning for all children. The movement toward state boarding schools for mathematics and science deserves our full support.

Opponents of the schools charge that they could drain academic and social leaders from local high schools, that they would be elitist, and that they would cost too much. But the experience of the existing schools indicates that these objections are ill-founded.

The public boarding schools appear to draw primarily students who are isolated in their local schools, not high achievers and social leaders. Gifted students are interested in esoteric matters that don't interest their peers; some choose to camouflage or deprecate their abilities rather than reveal their knowledge and suffer the social consequences.

Braughn Taylor, deputy director of North Carolina's School of Science and Mathematics, says that when he asks graduating seniors what they gained from their school experience, "they don't talk about physics and calculus; they say they learned to get along with other people."

School officials claim that students become more verbal and socially adept--skills necessary for job success. While a great deal of attention has been paid to the ability of the Japanese to produce high-quality technological products, it is in the social sphere that the Japanese have made their most important contribution to industrial development: They have introduced new ways of making decisions and building consensus in organizations. The boarding-school environment fosters the growth of these skills.

The schools hardly perpetuate an elitist attitude. Students accustomed to earning A's with minimal effort in their local schools find that B's and C's are commonplace; those who never had to study before find they must cultivate good work habits and budget their time. Patrick McWilliams, head of the English department at the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, says, "We're a remedial school for gifted youngsters."

The schools also break down elitism by involving students in service activities. In North Carolina and Illinois, students must spend three or four hours a week on such tasks as working on the grounds, serving meals in the cafeteria, or shelving books in the library.

And ability to pay does not influence eligibility for state-funded residential schools as it does for private boarding schools. Selection is based solely on academic ability, and officials say that some students need financial aid just to have adequate funds for transportation and spending money.

Fear that districts with a record of high achievement will lose their best students to these schools has proven to be unfounded. Students in the wealthier school districts that offer advanced courses in math and science have fewer incentives for leaving.

In fact, most students in the special schools come from either small, rural districts or large, urban areas where resources are limited. These poorer districts cannot cater to the needs of one or two youngsters with special talents. Many of the young people in the residential schools have exhausted all math and science courses available locally, but are not socially ready to attend college.

Recruitment almost guarantees fair representation. Illinois limits the number of participants from each district; the current student body represents more than 100 districts in the state. To ensure a diverse population, the Illinois school has set up a recruitment center in Chicago's inner city. In North Carolina, students represent each Congressional district and reflect the state's ethnic population.

Another misconception about the residential schools, according to their administrators, is the notion that they take money away from the local school districts. In fact, funding comes directly from the state legislature. But the schools also receive financial support from private foundations and industry.

Parents have been generous with their support as well. In North Carolina, parents sponsor all athletic and social activities; last year, 83 percent of the parent body contributed.

If the allocations for the special schools were instead distributed throughout the state, the funds would not be sufficient to support programs in each school. The most economical way to educate youngsters gifted in mathematics and science is to bring them to one location.

Officials also say regular schools would not attract such unusually talented faculties. The special schools have drawn teachers with unconventional backgrounds--computer experts, actuaries, and scientists, many with Ph.D.'s. Even with funding, a national shortage of math and science teachers would preclude the necessary staffing in most districts.

Courses that are rarely available at the high-school level--for example, organic chemistry, molecular biology, and mathematical modeling--are standard fare at most special schools, where four years of study in science and mathematics are typically required for graduation. Students may win exemption from courses by taking examinations, and those who want to complete a course at their own pace and style may pursue individualized study options. Independent study is also available for students wishing to explore a topic not offered in the curriculum.

Through mentorship programs--another feature of special-school curricula--upper-level students can choose to spend a year participating in the work of professional researchers at area universities and industries.

Like our finest private schools, the public boarding schools provide the advantages of a total academic community. Opportunities for fostering social and moral development are numerous. Saturday classes and evening seminars allow more extensive use of the facilities.

These schools also provide optimal sites for improving curriculum and methodology for the general school population. Approximately 4,000 teachers have participated in workshops at the North Carolina school during the last 7 years. To encourage the teaching of physics, the school even lends equipment to other schools in the state. In Illinois, the school philosophy includes a dual commitment to nurturing student talent and serving as a laboratory for developing, testing, and disseminating innovative techniques for secondary-school teachers.

The recent report of the College Board's task force on curriculum reform and instructional strategies recommends the establishment of research and development centers to help improve mathematics and science education. With their experienced, broadly trained faculties, public boarding schools would make ideal locations for these centers.

The belief that curricula for the gifted students are inappropriate for regular students is erroneous; challenging material that emphasizes higher levels of thinking is good for all.

The students currently enrolled in public boarding schools are achieving impressive results. Of the 170 students who make up the Illinois school's first graduating class this year, 56 are semifinalists in the National Merit Scholarship program--the highest number for any school in the state. At the North Carolina school, 42 percent of the current seniors are National Merit semifinalists, placing that school at the top of the state. Performance on the verbal as well as the mathematical sections of the Scholastic Aptitude Test is equally strong, with the average scores exceeding national norms by 150 to 200 points for both schools.

Perhaps most impressive is the number of students who continue their study of mathematics and science beyond high school. Eighty-two percent of the 1983 graduates of the North Carolina school majored in mathematics, science, or technology in college, and of those who went on to graduate school, over 80 percent are pursuing advanced studies in these fields.

Providing programs for gifted young people is a source of discomfort for those who think equality means the same education for all. As the gifted-and-talented educator James Gallagher has observed, society likes the products of gifted people but doesn't like them. Historically, our nation has supported the nurturing of special talents only when there was an urgent need to do so.

The current shortage of people skilled in science and mathematics threatens our economic security and ability to compete in world markets. Developing the talents of each individual to the fullest through public education is consistent with democratic principles--and more important, necessary to our survival.

Vol. 08, Issue 31, Page 36

Published in Print: April 26, 1989, as Public Boarding Schools for Gifted Deserve Support
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >