O'Neill Would Create Trust Fund for K-12 Education

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Proclaiming his support for education in the face of a mounting budget deficit, Gov. William A. O'Neill of Connecticut last week urged creation of a trust fund to finance school programs.

To help pay for the fund, Mr. O'Neill called for the largest tax increase in state history.

School groups hailed the proposals, included in the Governor's address on the 1990 budget, as a way of ensuring stable support for education programs and shielding them from cuts in overall state spending.

Only a 'Cloak?'

But the proposal came under heavy fire from many lawmakers, who made clear their strong objection to the new taxes. These legislators accused Mr. O'Neill of using the fund as a "cloak" to make a tax increase more politically palatable.

Such objections set the stage for a bruising battle over ways to close an $882-million deficit for this year. The shortfall could jeopardize school funding, warned Representative Naomi Cohen, House chairman of the joint education committee.

"I would like to think there will always be a dedicated fund for education," she said. "But the problem with the trust fund is that it relies on the creation of revenue raisers."

The proposal calls for the establishment of an Educational Excellence Fund, separate from the general budget, to finance aid to local districts and other school programs. In 1990, the fund would receive an estimated $1.12 billion.

"We owe it to our children and our future," Governor O'Neill said, "to establish a fund that is stable and that will distribute money fairly in the years ahead to the towns of Connecticut without putting an undue burden on the local taxpayer."

The Governor recommended that the fund be financed with revenues from the lottery and other gaming, 0.5 percent of the state sales tax, the real-estate conveyance tax, and four new taxes.

Four New Taxes

The proposed levies, which are expected to raise $688 million, include a 7.5 percent sales tax on utility bills; elimination of the exemption in the sales tax for services to businesses; an increase in the capital-gains tax; and a corporate-tax surcharge.

Commissioner of Education Gerald N. Tirozzi said the proposal would enable state officials to "implement our agenda."

"When all is said and done," he said, "the commitment is there."

He added, however, that the tight fiscal situation might force curtailment or a delay until next year of his forthcoming plan for achieving racial balance in the schools.

Representative Cohen pointed out, moreover, that Governor O'Neill recommended some cuts in education programs. Although the total school-aid budget would rise by 5.5 percent, she noted, Mr. O'Neill proposed elimination of grants to districts for professional development and a $21-million reduction in the projected increase in aid to cities and towns.

Such cuts may force districts to hike local taxes, she said, since officials have already negotiated teacher contracts based on the expected increase.

But the reductions under Governor O'Neill's plan would fall more heavily on relatively wealthy towns, which are better able to absorb them, noted Mark Waxenberg, president of the Connecticut Education Association.

'Laid Down the Gauntlet'

The union leader added, however, that he was concerned that the proposed fund would rely on tax revenues, which tend to "rise and fall."

"Should revenues fall," he continued, "there should be a mechanism to make sure resources are available" to education.

Mr. Tirozzi predicted that the legislature would eventually find the needed revenues.

Governor O'Neill "has laid down the gauntlet," he said. "I am hoping the General Assembly will rally behind him."

Vol. 08, Issue 21

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >