Tax Overhaul Is Awaiting Voters' Approval in Pennsylvania

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Pennsylvania voters will be asked this spring to endorse major changes in the way local school revenues are collected, under legislation signed by Gov. Robert P. Casey last month.

The tax-reform plan, which had been debated for nearly two years, would allow school districts to increase local income taxes in return for cuts in property taxes and the elimination of per-capita, residence, occupational-privilege, and other "nuisance" taxes.

The measure won final approval in the Senate at 11:58 P.M. on Nov. 30, just two minutes before the end of the legislature's 1988 session.

Governor Casey, a Democrat, first called for the tax changes in his January 1987 inaugural address. The bill passed by lawmakers was based on recommendations by a blue-ribbon panel that he and the legislature created in November that year.

According to Thomas J. Gentzel, a lobbyist for the Pennsylvania School Boards Association, the proposal re4presents "a big step in the right direction." He said it would give all districts more flexibility in taxation and allow those with low property values to generate additional revenues for schools.

George Badner, a spokesman for the Pennsylvania Education Association, said the state's education organizations plan an intensive lobbying effort to win its endorsement at the polls.

Tax reform, however, is only one part of the battle to revise Pennsylvania's school-aid system, Mr. Badner added. In the coming year, the pea and other groups will press the Governor and lawmakers for a major increase in aid to districts, which Mr. Badner said is now about 10 percent to 15 percent below what the state funding formula requires.

The proposed tax changes would take effect in 1990 if they are approved by voters during a special election tentatively scheduled for May.

Robert Feir, legislative liaison for the state board of education, said the proposal would allow districts gradually to raise their local income-tax rates, from the current maximum of 0.5 percent to 1.5 percent, over a four-year period. Some districts could seek court approval to raise their rates more quickly, he added.

Districts that raise their income taxes would be forced to reduce property taxes by at least 25 percent. In addition, they would have to eliminate their nuisance taxes, which Mr. Feir noted are typically difficult to collect.

State education officials said the plan's effects would vary among districts due to differences in the types of taxes they levy.

Robert Grotevant, a spokesman for the Governor, described the bill's passage as a "legislative miracle."

"There were certainly some pretty dark moments," he said. "But, after 20 years, everyone in Pennsylvania has realized that high property taxes were driving people away" from the state and depriving many of the chance to own a home.

Opposition to the bill was centered in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Senator Joseph Loeper, the chamber's majority whip, had argued that the legislature had not been given adequate time to study the proposal. The plan's backers, meanwhile, claimed that the Republicans were simply trying to deprive the Democratic governor of a major legislative victory.

Intense lobbying by the Governor persuaded five Republicans to break party ranks and vote for the measure moments before the session's conclusion. Observers said the Senate was able to beat the deadline only because the Democratic lieutenant governor, who was presiding at the time, ignored the shouted protests of Senator Loeper.

The bill's critics predict that they and taxpayers' groups will be able to persuade voters that the plan needs work and should not be approved.

Vol. 08, Issue 16

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >