Cavazos Backs Holocaust-Study Rejection

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--Rebuffing an appeal by 66 members of the Congress, Secretary of Education Lauro F. Cavazos has reaffirmed his department's decision not to fund dissemination of a controversial curriculum on the Holocaust.

A leading critic of the department's action, Representative Ted Weiss, Democrat of New York, in an interview expessed dissatisfaction with Mr. Cavazos's response and vowed to push legislation both to secure funding for "Facing History and Ourselves" and to ensure fairness in future competitions for National Diffusion Network grants.

Mr. Weiss had held a hearing of his intergovernmental affairs subcommittee in October on charges that a department official had manipulated the 1988 award process to deny "Facing History" a grant. (See Education Week, Oct. 26, 1988.)

"I would have hoped that Mr. Cavazos would have taken a fresh look at the situation and not be snowed by the bureaucracy, which is what obviously happened," Mr. Weiss said last week. "The process was clearly flawed, and this program has been given a raw deal," he said, noting that it had been turned down for funding three times under highly contentious circumstances.

In 1986 and 1987, the program was given low marks by reviewers who, critics charged, were selected for their conservative views. A storm of debate erupted over the comments of some reviewers, one of whom said the curriculum failed to represent the views of the Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan.

The program received high scores from 1988 review panelists and was recommended for funding by the ndn staff. But Shirley Curry, then serving as director of the Education Department's recognition division, decided not to fund any applicants in three categories, including the one in which "Facing History" had applied.

Sources in the office of educational research and improvement said that Ms. Curry acted solely to deny the program a grant, and recalled that she had told them she was motivated by conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly's dislike of the curriculum. Ms. Curry is a former member of the board of directors of Eagle Forum, which Ms. Schlafly heads.

At the October hearing, Ms. Curry denied the charges and contended that there was more "educational need" for programs in other areas.

In a letter also signed by 65 other House members, Mr. Weiss asked Mr. Cavazos to investigate and to consider giving "Facing History" a grant from his discretionary fund.

"I want to assure you that I have thoroughly reviewed this matter and have found no evidence of antisemitic bias against the 'Facing History and Ourselves' program," Mr. Cavazos said in a letter to Mr. Weiss.

Mr. Cavazos said the 1988 funding decisions for the ndn "were made on the basis of priorities determined by the department and the program office" under "an established practice which is within the department's guidelines for making grand award recommendations."

In the future, he said, the department would decide which categories to fund before the ndn competition began.

Max McConkey, head of the National Dissemination Study Group, an organization of professionals who work with the ndn, criticized Mr. Cavazos's stance. Although the Secretary promised "fair and equitable processes for the future and a fair and open examination of what happened last year," Mr. McConkey said, he "pulled back from that promise on both fronts."

"It doesn't appear a thorough investigation was conducted, as key people were not contacted," he added.

A department spokesman said officials would not specify how the investigation was conducted. However, oeri sources supported Mr. McConkey's contention that employees who work on the ndn were not interviewed.

Critics had not charged Ms. Curry with anti-Semitism, Mr. McConkey said, or questioned her authority to act as she did--only the fairness of her actions.

Finally, he said, Mr. Cavazos' promise is not an adequate safeguard against a recurrence.

Vol. 08, Issue 16

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >