Proposed Spec.-Ed. Regulations in Dispute

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

WASHINGTON--A proposed Education Department regulation that could require some states to set higher standards for professionals working in special education has divided groups representing various interests in the field.

The provision, proposed as part of the regulations governing the Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1986, PL 99-457, would base personnel standards in special education on the state's highest requirements for each specialist's particular profession.

To the extent that current requirements do not conform to these standards, the proposed rule says, "the state would have to require the retraining or rehiring of personnel that meet appropriate professional requirements in the state.''

Some organizations, such as the National Association of School Psychologists, the National Association of Pupil Service Organizations, and a number of special-education groups, have charged that the rule could in some cases raise special-education costs and exacerbate personnel shortages in the field.

They point out, for example, that psychologists working in schools might need a doctorate to match the standards often set for psychologists in private practice--even though doctoral training, which includes a heavy emphasis on clinical research, might not be appropriate for a school setting.

Other groups, however, see the emphasis on meeting the individual profession's standards as a needed safeguard. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association claims, for example, that many state education agencies now routinely hire speech pathologists whose training is less adequate than what the profession advises.

"The intent should be to make sure that consumers in all settings are receiving services from those who are qualified,'' said Stan Dublinske, a director of state and regulatory policy for the speech pathologists' group.

The department's proposal, which was published in the Federal Register in April, is the second version of the personnel-standards regulation. The department orginally proposed allowing state education agencies either to follow the "highest standard'' or to adopt an "alternative'' standard deemed appropriate by the state.

The comment period on the proposed regulations ended June 13.

A department spokesman said final regulations for the new personnel standards are expected sometime before the fiscal year ends on Sept. 30. --DV

Vol. 07, Issue 39 Extra Edition

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Dyslexia: How to Identify Warning Signs at Every Grade

Increased Social Connectedness Through Digital Peer Learning

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >