Justice Dept. Will Press To End Desegregation Suits

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

WASHINGTON--The Justice Department plans to press for the dismissal of nine school-desegregation cases in Georgia, despite indications that the districts in question would prefer not to become involved in the litigation that would be required.

"The law is clear,'' Nathaniel Douglas, chief of the department's educational-opportunities-litigation section said last week. "If a district has complied with its orders, the case should be closed.''

The nine cases have become a test of the department's plan to seek dismissals in any federal desegregation suits in which district officials have complied with relevant court orders for a minimum of three years. Department officials are reviewing as many as 220 such cases to determine if they are eligible for dismissal. (See Education Week, May 25, 1988.)

The department acknowledges in its most recent filing in the case that U.S. District Judge Wilbur Owens would need to rule on the issue of whether the districts have attained "unitary status,'' the legal designation for a district that has fully remedied past constitutional violations.

Such a determination would require a trial because the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc., which represents plaintiffs in the cases, opposes the department's motions for dismissal, officials with both parties said last week.

Whose Proof Burden?

The primary issue dividing Justice and the LDF, who are nominally on the same side in the cases, is which party should bear the burden of proof in any further desegregation-related litigation.

Department lawyers argue in their filing that once a school district has met its constitutional obligations to remedy past discrimination, it should be held to the same standard of proof as a district that had never been found liable for segregation.

Under that standard, any party accusing a district of illegal discrimination would have the difficult task of proving that school officials intended to discriminate when taking the action in question.

Lawyers for the LDF, on the other hand, argue that the protections won in desegregation cases should be permanent, and that school boards should bear the burden of proving that actions that appear discriminatory were in fact motivated by other legitimate concerns.

The LDF, in a brief filed in response to the department's argument, suggests that it would be willing to allow dismissal of the nine Georgia cases if permanent injunctions issued in the cases in 1974 were allowed to remain in effect.

"It is clear that the burden of proof is on the districts under the 1974 orders,'' Mr. Douglas said last week.

Lawyers for eight of the nine districts indicated at a judicial conference in May that they would be willing to leave the 1974 orders in place, according to Norman Chachkin, a lawyer for the LDF.

Lawyers and officials for several of the nine districts have said in interviews that they would prefer to remain under judicial supervision, which they said has not proved burdensome, rather than become involved in lengthy litigation.

But in its brief, the department argues that "the fact that one or two of the three parties may not want the court to determine whether it can lawfully retain jurisdiction of the case does not mitigate the court's obligation to do so, especially when another party in the case--i.e. plaintiff United States--has asked for such a determination.''

The department suggests that a new permanent injunction, which would shift the burden of proof to the plaintiffs, be entered when the cases are dismissed. The next step is up to Judge Owens, who must determine how the cases should proceed.

The department is continuing its review of other cases that might prove eligible for dismissal, but will not file new motions until the Georgia cases are ruled on, Mr. Douglas said last week.

The review has also turned up some school districts in which "there may be a need for enforcement action, and we'll be doing that,'' he said.

Vol. 07, Issue 39 Extra Edition

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >