Department Modifies Stance On Diffusion Network Rules

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--Following charges that proposed new rules for the National Diffusion Network could politicize the program, the Education Department has modified some of the most controversial provisions.

The final regulations, published Aug. 14, place certain limits on a new "program significance panel" that would screen curricular projects submitted to the network for possible dissemination. Plans for such a panel have drawn harsh criticism from many lawmakers and educators, who warn that its creation could lead to censorship of instructional programs.

Under the revised rules, a program could be accepted by the network after review by a "program effectiveness panel" analogous to the current review panel. The effectiveness panel, rather than the significance panel, would do the initial screening. Federal funding to aid selected programs would still be contingent on a high score from both panels.

"The significance panel no longer precludes a program from being part of the network," said Ronald P. Preston, a deputy assistant secretary in the office of educational research and improvement, which oversees the n.d.n. "It just makes a judgment, allows us to provide a guide to what is in the program, to suggest appropriate grade levels, to say it is controversial."

In addition, the department has tightened the criteria for review by the significance panel. The regulations state that that panel "will not act as a censor or otherwise interfere with the authority of local school districts to select curricular materials."

The department also withdrew a proposal to permanently fund its school-recognition program through the n.d.n., as well as a rule limiting network grants to six years. However, a new category of grants and funding for a national "private-school facilitator" remain, despite opposition.

The final rules are "minimally better" than the original proposal, said Max McConkey, a spokesman for the National Dissemination Study Group, a professional association of n.d.n. members.

"I think the protest from the field and Capitol Hill had some impact. We're still not happy with it, but this has reduced considerably the impact" of the significance panel, he said.

The department's proposals still face stiff opposition on Capitol Hill, observers noted.

During the debate on the appropriations bill passed by the House last month, Representatives engaged in carefully worded discussion in an effort to establish that the Congress does not intend to fund content-review procedures for the n.d.n. Up until now, programs have been selected only on the basis of "educational effectiveness." Lawmakers are weighing the possibility of including a prohibition on the policy shift in the report that will accompany the final appropriations bill.

Last May, as part of HR 5, its omnibus school-improvement bill, the House voted to block most of the changes planned for the network. The Senate is likely to take similar action next year, according to staff aides.

"At worst, the Administration has a year of grace and then HR 5 will undo" the changes, Mr. McConkey said. "I have pledged to work with [department officials] and objectively assess how it works out."

Vol. 07, Issue 01

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >