Difficulties in Preventing Dropouts Are Identified

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Copyright 1987
The study was conducted by the U.S. General Accounting Office.

The gao researchers surveyed 479 local dropout-prevention programs, finding little evaluation data for most of the programs and widespread variation in the kinds of services offered and the types of students targeted for assistance.

The report also notes that school systems use varying methods to calculate their dropout rates.

"The availability of standardized data is a prerequisite for measuring the relative effectiveness of dropout programs," the authors write.

Despite the program variations, however, the researchers compiled a list of characteristics commonly cited by school officials as components of "effective" dropout-prevention efforts.

Such programs, according to the directors surveyed, must include:

Multiple services--including, particularly, basic education and counseling.

Some preparation for the General Educational Development test for students who have already dropped out.

A "caring and committed staff, a nonthreatening learning environment, a low teacher-student ratio, and program flexibility."

Five copies of the report per request may be obtained without charge by writing the U.S. General Accounting Office, P.O. Box 6015, Gaithersburg, Md. 20877; or by calling (202) 275-6241.

Additional copies are $2 each.


Vol. 07, Issue 01

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories