Asbestos-Abatement Rules Too Lax, Groups Charge

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--The Environmental Protection Agency's proposed regulations for asbestos abatement in schools are too lax to ensure that students and employees will be protected from the cancer-causing material, critics have told agency officials and members of a House panel.

At a two-day public hearing held by the epa and in a meeting of the House Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources, spokesmen for public-employee unions and other groups charged last month that the rules do not offer districts enough guidance to determine whether their facilities are unsafe and, if so, what steps they should take to address the problem.

In addition, they harshly criticized a provision that would permit districts to give equal weight to cost and health factors in deciding on abatement methods.

The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986 requires the epa to issue new rules for asbestos management in schools by next month. The agency's proposal, released in April, would mandate that all districts inspect their buildings and develop management plans by October 1988; districts would have to implement those plans by July 1989.

At the epa hearing, John F. Welch, president of the Safe Buildings Alliance, an association of building-product manufacturers, testified that the proposed regulations do not adequately define what level of exposure to asbestos would pose a risk.

Scott Strauss, a lawyer for the Service Employees International Union, said his group strongly opposed the provision that would allow districts to balance health concerns and cost considerations.

"Under the proposed regulation, we can look forward to an era in which schools, with the epa's blessing, will be able to avoid undertaking abatement projects necessary to protect the health of schoolchildren, workers, and teachers, because they want to spend the money on far less urgent needs," Mr. Strauss said.

"For example, under epa's proposed rule schoolchildren and employees could be forced to learn and work in a classroom contaminated by asbestos fibers," he added, "while the school board defers cleanup in favor of new seats in the auditorium."

Michael M. Stahl, chief of the school-assistance section of the epa's office of pesticides and toxic substances, said last week in an interview that the agency would revise the regulations to reflect issues raised at the hearings and in the 170 comments it has received on the subject.

He noted that, because the evidence is inconclusive, the final rules would not set standards for exposure to airborne asbestos particles.--ef

Vol. 07, Issue 01

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >