San Jose Bias Remedies Offer 'Choice'

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A federal district judge opened hearings last week on a pair of desegregation plans for the San Jose, Calif., public schools that both employ a politically popular selling point: the promise to enhance parental choice in education.

In papers filed with the court last month, the Hispanic parents who are plaintiffs in the case argue that a program of "controlled open enrollment"--patterned on one used by the Cambridge, Mass., public schools--would be the best means of promoting choice while achieving the greatest possible degree of integration in the city's schools.

San Jose school officials, meanwhile, are advocating for the same reasons the adoption of a plan--patterned after one in Milwaukee--that relies mainly on selective school closings and a major expansion of the district's magnet-school program.

The hearings on the plans began Dec. 11 and were scheduled to end late this week. U.S. District Judge Robert F. Peckham has agreed to a request by city officials that he reach a decision in the case by Dec. 31 to enable the district to qualify for state school-desegregation assistance.

Last week's hearings were the latest development in Diaz v. San Jose Unified School District, a 14-year-old suit with a complex legal history.

Throughout that history, San Jose officials have conceded that schools in the crescent-shaped, 16-mile-long district are racially imbalanced, with Hispanics concentrated in the district's older, northern section. The officials, however, attribute the imbalance to a racially neutral neighborhood-school policy.

The 30,000-student district currently has an enrollment that is about 57 percent white, 31 percent Hispanic, and 12 percent black and Asian.

Decision Overturned

Judge Peckham twice ruled in the district's favor, as did a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. That decision was overturned by a 8-to-3 vote when the case was reheard by all 11 judges on the circuit court. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the case earlier this year, sending it back to Judge Peckham for the de-velopment of a remedial plan. (See Education Week, May 8, 1985.)

The proposal put forward by the plaintiffs would divide the district into three slender zones that include both Hispanic and white areas of the elongated district. Parents would be required to provide school officials with a list ranking in order the schools they would want their children to attend within their designated zone.

Competing Plans

The racial composition of each school would be allowed to deviate by only 5 percentage points from the racial composition of that zone's total student population for the age group attending the school.

Michael J. Alves, director of the Massachusetts' Title IV desegregation-assistance center and one of the developers of the plan, said he estimates that 30 percent of all parents would not be granted their first choice of school.

Under the competing plan, San Jose officials propose closing a predominantly Hispanic high school in the northern section of the district and reassigning its students to nearby predominantly white schools. In addition, all 14 schools in the district's predominantly Hispanic section would either be converted into magnet schools or would offer certain magnet programs.

The district's plan provides for mandatory student reassignments if, after four years, the plan fails to shift the racial composition in each school to within 20 percentage points of the racial composition of the district as a whole.

Vol. 05, Issue 16

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >