Texas Adopts Disputed Textbooks

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The Texas Board of Education voted this month to adopt five controversial 7th-grade life-sciences textbooks, two of which had been rejected by the California Board of Education in September because of their "watered-down" treatment of evolution.

People for the American Way, a civil-liberties advocacy group, criticized all five of the texts on the grounds that they inadequately covered evolution.

"The board's action shows that proponents of 'creationism' still hold more sway than the testimony of numerous educators, scientists, and professors," said Anthony T. Podesta, president of pfaw

The board also rejected--but later, yielding to pressure, accepted--a high-school-level American history textbook that some board members had found politically biased. Also reversed was a unanimous decision to require publishers of American history books to identify the political affiliations of all public figures quoted in the texts.

The initial vote to reject the book Our Land, Our Times, which had been recommended by the state textbook committee, followed charges by the textbook critic Mel Gabler that the book was biased against the Republican Party. In addition, said observers, a board member charged that the book presented a negative view of the past 40 years of American history.

But after local press coverage of the votes and discussion by the full board on both issues, the board reversed both actions the following day.

According to Terry Anderson, a board spokesman, some 200 texts were approved, including books for high-school English language and composition, junior-high-school art, business management, journalism, and physics.

Local district committees select textbooks from among those approved by the board. Ms. Anderson said that districts will purchase an estimated $93-million worth of texts in the 1986-87 school year.--ab

Vol. 05, Issue 13

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >