Debt-Reduction Bill Hitting Snags, Could Cause Education Cuts

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--House Democratic leaders last week predicted that the Congress would pass a measure to eliminate the U.S. budget deficit by 1991--a move that could sharply reduce federal education spending.

As of last Friday morning, however, a House-Senate conference committee had failed to reach a compromise acceptable to Democrats, who object strenuously to numerous provisions in the measure, known as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings bill.

The Senate passed it last month as a rider to legislation to lift the debt ceiling above $2 trillion. Senate leaders were reportedly trying to force the House to vote on the Gramm-Rudman measure by opposing a short-term rise of the debt ceiling, which is needed to allow the government to borrow funds to cover its checks.

The failure of House-Senate conferees to negotiate an accord, amid mounting pressure from the White House in support of the budget-cutting bill, will probably lead to passage of the Senate version of the legislation, which has been modified slightly, according to education lobbyists and lawmakers.

"There is going to be a Gramm-Rudman bill," House Speaker Thomas P. O'Neill told reporters, but "not with my support."

The legislation, HJ Res 372, would trigger automatic cuts in federal spending if the projected annual deficit exceeded a limit set in the statute. The cuts would be made by the President if the Congress cannot agree on them.

But about half of the federal budget--including Social Security, defense contracts, and interest on the debt--would be exempt from cuts, leaving education, child-nutrition, and job-training particularly vulnerable to deep reductions.

Senate conferees rejected a Democratic proposal to exempt from cuts programs aimed at the poor, such as Chapter 1 compensatory education and Head Start.

Education lobbyists have feared that because of a "technical glitch''--most of the money for education programs is spent a year after it is approved--a disproportionately large cut in budgets would be re-quired to get actual savings.

Under their "worst-case scenario," the mandated cuts might result, for instance, in reductions of 40 percent in Chapter 1 and 67 percent in special-education programs.

Omnibus Bill on Hold

On another budget-cutting bill, the House completed consideration of its omnibus budget reconciliation act, HR 3500. That bill permanently raises the federal cigarette tax to 16 cents and requires all new state and local government employees to be covered under Medicare.

The Senate, however, did not resume consideration its version of the bill, S 1730. That measure also includes the cigarette tax but requires school districts and other public employers to provide Medicare coverage for all their employees.

Public-employees' unions, including teachers' unions, are unanimously opposed to the Medicare provision, which would require public employees and employers each to contribute 1.45 percent of the employee salaries to Medicare.

Vol. 05, Issue 10

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >