High-School Reforms Found To Bolster Basic Skills

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Pittsburgh--Recent efforts to improve secondary schools have yielded advances in students' basic skills, better school attendance, and greater business and community support, according to a survey of officials in the nation's largest urban districts.

But improvement efforts are having less impact on teacher turnover, the number of students needing remedial courses, and students' academic performance outside of basic-skills areas.

The survey results were released this month at the Council of the Great City Schools' fall conference here. The council represents 35 urban districts that enroll 11.4 percent of the nation's elementary and secondary students.

The "Secondary School Improvement Study," prepared by Thomas R. Owens of the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory for the4council, is based on surveys of district superintendents and of principals in three sample high schools from each district.

Twenty-six districts responded to the survey of superintendents, and 71 schools, representing 28 districts, responded to the survey of principals. Improvement efforts were defined as any planned change to improve schools undertaken since 1980.

Findings of Surveys

Among the major findings:

Two-thirds of the superintendents reported that both student homework assignments and time allocated to academic skills have increased significantly in their districts.

Eighty-one percent of the districts reported increases in graduation requirements since 1980. The full effect of these changes, the report said, will probably not be seen for at least several years, but at least one-fourth of the districts reported they had already reduced their elective courses by up to 20 percent. A third of the districts reported losing up to 20 percent of their teachers in electives.

At least a third of the districts reported that the new graduation requirements had led to increased testing and increased support from parents and the community.

Half of the superintendents and nearly half of the principals indicated that their goals of high expectations for student learning, strong instructional quality, and a "curriculum based on clear goals and objectives" had been advanced significantly as a result of school-improvement efforts.

Nearly half of the superintendents reported significant increases in ''clear and focused instruction" and in close monitoring of the learning process.

Although 42 percent of the superintendents and 44 percent of the principals reported that "explicit standards for classroom behavior" had been set more often, only 15 percent of the superintendents and 25 percent of the principals reported great increases in "smooth and efficient classroom routines."

A third of the superintendents reported lengthening the school day or year in their districts.

"For the most part, we have in place the superstructure--a well-defined and appropriate curriculum,4

appropriate materials related to the goals in the curriculum, and a good testing and accountability program, although it could be in more districts," commented Walter E. Hathaway, director of research and evaluation for the Portland (Ore.) Public Schools. "What we don't have is a direct-support system for the teacher."

'Bottom-Up Strategy'

According to Samuel E. Husk, executive director of the council, the report shows that it is "time to move on."

"It's clear that we've done most of the top-down things that we needed to do as far as setting up policy, plans, and procedures," he said. "Now it's time to start building a bottom-up strategy."

Mr. Husk said many of the council's member districts "will be moving, within the next year or so, into school-site improvement efforts that will allow considerable flexibility for teachers and school-based administrators to come up with individual models" for improvement.

The report includes a list of districts and schools that have "exemplary school-improvement policies" in various areas, as evaluated by the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Council members will receive a free copy of the report. Others can obtain a copy by sending a purchase order, check, or money order for $7.50 to Mr. Husk at the Council of Great City Schools, 1413 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005.

Vol. 05, Issue 05

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories