Public-, Private-School Test Scores Compared

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The average standardized-test scores of students in suburban public schools with high academic standards approach those of students in comparable private schools and are significantly higher than those of other public-school students.

The comparative findings come from an analysis of test results from the Comprehensive Testing Program--the standardized test employed by most of the nation's independent schools.

The Educational Records Bureau, a nonprofit education organization that distributes the CTP examinations, annually makes available the normative data necessary to make comparisons of test performance in the various school environments.

A select group of public schools hold membership in the ERB and administer the test routinely, along with independent schools. Test data from other public schools come from field testing by the Educational Testing Service, which developed the CTP exam to the bureau's specifications.

The ERB, founded in 1927 at Teachers College, Columbia University, has more than 900 members.

Suburban public schools are elected to membership in the ERB based on a number of criteria. These include a per-pupil expenditure of at least $4,000, median student test scores 15 to 25 percentile points above the national public-school medians on achievement tests, a 25-to-1 student-teacher ratio, graduation rates of at least 90 percent, and college-going rates of at least 80 percent, with at least a 45 to 50 percent rate for four-year colleges.

The CTP test was given to some 125,000 independent-school students and some 80,000 suburban public-school students last year. Test items have a greater level of difficulty than commercially prepared standardized tests, according to R. Bruce McGill, president of the ERB Many commercial examinations, he said, fail to test the able and very able student adequately.

Taken by students in grades 1-10, the test includes multiple-choice achievement and aptitude questions focused on listening, reading comprehension, word analysis, mathematics, vocabulary, the mechanics of writing, and English expression.

Mr. McGill attributed the differences in test scores mainly to differences in student bodies. "The independent-school population is selective," he said. "You therefore have a more academically competitive group."

He added that smaller class size, greater resources, and a more nurturing environment may also contribute to the higher test scores in suburban and independent schools.

What the examination tells school systems, he added, is how suburban public-school students compare with similar private-school populations. "It's a way of assessing school effectiveness," he said. "Is the school getting the kind of mileage out of the kids you would expect?"

Vol. 05, Issue 02, Page 18

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >