PUSH-EXCEL Asked To Return Federal Funds

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--The Education Department announced last week that it has asked a nonprofit educational organization founded by the Rev. Jesse L. Jackson to return more than $700,000 in federal funds that it says were misspent.

The organization, push for Excellence Inc., has until the end of this month to appeal the demand for repayment that was made by the department's contracts and grants office, according to John C. Yazurlo, ed's deputy inspector general.

A spokesman for the Chicago-based group, which is commonly referred to as push-excel, said it planned to ask the department's audit appeals board to overturn the ruling of the contracts office.

According to press reports, Mr. Jackson, who is running for the Democratic Party's Presidential nomination, criticized the timing of the announcement as "something very nasty and almost conspiratorial."

Day Before Primary

The department announced the request for repayment on April 9, one day before Pennsylvania's Presidential primary. It officially notified the organization of its findings in letters dated March 30 and March 31.

"They allege nothing criminal," Mr. Jackson told reporters while campaigning in Pittsburgh. "If in the end push owes any money, it'll pay what is due."

According to Mr. Yazurlo, push-excel received $3.1 million in five grants and contracts from the department between 1978 and 1980, of which $708,431 must be returned. The funds were for programs intended to improve attitudes among black inner-city youths about education and to help them move into the labor market following graduation from high school.

Last August, department auditors determined that the group spent at least $736,972 in violation of federal rules governing grants and contracts.

The auditors also indicated that push-excel could not provide adequate documentation or other evidence to prove that an additional $1.1 million was spent in accord with the regulations. (See Education Week, Aug. 31, 1983.)

In September 1981, the department temporarily revoked an $825,000 grant to the group because it reportedly refused to allow federal auditors to review its accounting procedures. The grant was reinstated after the group agreed to the review.--tm

Vol. 03, Issue 29

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >