Supreme Court Turns Down N.Y. Case On Use of Exit Tests for Handicapped

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--The U.S. Supreme Court last week turned down a New York school district's request that it rule on the state's use of competency tests as a graduation requirement for handicapped students.

Without comment, the Justices declined to review a ruling by the state's highest court that all students--including the handicapped--must demonstrate proficiency on the test in order to receive high-school diplomas and that students were given adequate notice to prepare for the examinations. (See Education Week, Nov. 2, 1983.)

In 1976, the state Board of Regents adopted a resolution requiring students to pass the test as a prerequisite for receiving a diploma. The new standard went into effect with the class of 1979.

The case, Board of Education of the Northport-East Northport Union Free School District v. Ambach (Case No. 83-1183), stemmed from a school board's decision in 1979 to award high-school diplomas to two handicapped students who failed all or part of the state examination. After learning of this action, the state commissioner of education, Gordon M. Ambach, ordered that the diplomas be revoked.

A trial judge ruled in favor of the students, holding that the commissioner's demand and the regulations upon which it was based violated the Due-Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

But an intermediate court reversed that ruling, stating that the students had no property right to a diploma nor any right to be free from the stigma of being denied one. The state, it said, "has legitimate reasons for setting diploma standards in order to protect and insure the integrity" of high-school diplomas. The state's highest court affirmed that opinion.

'Myriad Deprivations'

"The denial of a diploma to a handicapped student, due to failure of the competency tests, results in myriad deprivations," the school district unsuccessfully argued in its petition for review.

"When the diploma is denied to handicapped students, based on the state's finding of 'incompetency,' their lives are affected in a demeaning, traumatic, and stigmatizing manner."

Furthermore, the district said, denial of a diploma "effectively forecloses" gainful employment. Finally, because of the requirement, handicapped students "anticipate failure on the tests ... and drop out of school."

The state, however, countered in its brief in the case that "although each student in New York State has a statutory right to a free elementary and secondary education at public expense, it does not follow that each student also has a property right to a diploma."

Although the two students named in the case had successfully completed their individualized educational programs, "there is no basis upon which to equate that achievement with the attainments required for high-school graduation," it argued.

Lawrence McNally, director of pupil services for the Northport district, said he was disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision not to review the case.

"In essence, the decision basically gives the state the legal right to discriminate against pupils with handicapping conditions," he said. "The courts totally have ignored the fact that the vast majority of children who fail to get diplomas are pupils with handicapping conditions."

But Lawrence C. Gloeckler, acting state assistant commissioner of education for children with handicapping conditions, said that "our position as a state is not that we are denying diplomas to handicapped children."

"First of all, many handicapped students get diplomas," he said. "That's something that gets lost in this debate. We believe that the majority of our handicapped children can meet the requirement."--tm

Vol. 03, Issue 27

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >