E.D. Reverses Policy on State Special-Education Hearing Officers

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--In a change in policy, the Education Department has advised state officials that employees of state education agencies, under certain conditions, now may serve as reviewing officers in local disputes over the education of handicapped children.

The interpretation modifies a ruling by the department a year ago that "categorically prohibited" state employees from serving as review officers under the due-process provision of P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act.

That earlier ruling, which was never promulgated and therefore not legally binding, was applauded by most advocates for the handicapped, who had argued the practice conflicted with the law's mandate for impartiality in deciding appeals from local decisions.

The department's new interpretation, described in a letter sent last month to all chief state school officers, sets out minimum standards by which the states can demonstrate impartiality in the selection of individuals to review appeals of decisions made at the local level.

The department's new interpretation is not legally binding but, according to the policy document, will be used to assess the state's compliance with the law and to determine eligibility for federal funds.

The department's review of the regulation was initiated following a series of legal challenges to administrative review procedures being used by the states, the document explained. In most of those cases, the courts have ruled that the use of state employees violated the federal statute and that state officials may not overrule the decisions of state-level reviewing officers.

Formal Fairness Standards

Under the new interpretation, state departments of education that use state education employees, chief state school officers, or state-board members as reviewing officers would be required to have formal written procedures that "ensure standards of ... fairness and impartiality" in the selection process.

Those standards specifically prohibit any state education employee serving as a review officer from personal involvement in the identification, evaluation, and placement of a handicapped child at the local level. The standards also prohibit sub-stantial involvement by a state-level review officer in the development of any state or local policy that is being challenged in a due-process hearing.

Furthermore, the hearing officer may not have been employed by any of the parties to the dispute; may not have been a participant in the selection of an administrator of the school district or agency involved in the hearing; and may not have a personal, economic, or professional interest in the outcome of the hearing, according to the Education Department's policy.

States Revised Program Plans

Because of the department's earlier interpretation of the federal law's requirements on due-process procedures, nearly half of the states had to revise their program plans in order to receive federal special-education funds, according to David Rostetter, acting director of the Education Department's division of assistance to the states.

In New York, where the state commissioner of education must by law review all decisions involving educational matters, the 1983 interpretation would have required a revision of the state's statute, he noted.

"One accusation is that we changed because some of the states complained," Mr. Rostetter said. But the department's reconsideration was prompted by the need for a clear policy, he contended.

"We thought further strategy would be to identify standards of impartiality," Mr. Rostetter said. "We expect and, in fact, require the states to administer and enforce the law at arm's length. There are some federal requirements already on the books to monitor complaints and enforce legal obligations, and we expect the states to meet those responsibilities."

"By further defining impartiality," Mr. Rostetter explained, "we allow the states to retain that role."

According to Mr. Rostetter said the standards also will apply to state-level hearing officers who are not direct employees of state departments of education.

Vol. 03, Issue 21

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >