Commission Suggests Ways To Reduce Special-Education Costs

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--A national commission of educators has concluded, in a report presented recently to the Congress, that the problems associated with the financing of special-education programs can be solved through a combination of administrative and programmatic changes.

Moreover, the Commission on Financing of a Free and Appropriate Education for Special Needs Children contends that the success of state and local programs for the handicapped depends on continued "federal leadership."

In its examination of the issues in special education, the 17-member panel reached a consensus on six recommendations for reducing program costs and improving services for the handicapped.

The report was delivered on March 16 to the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Select Education, according to Nancy Zollers of Research for Better Schools (rbs), a Philadelphia-based, nonprofit educational agency, which organized the commission's work.

Ms. Zollers said the report is intended to clarify the issues surrounding the implementation of P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act.

"There were some faulty assumptions regarding 94-142 and it was creating a foggy environment," Ms. Zollers said. "There are important issues being discussed in Washington and we wanted to bring the discussion to a different level."

"The attempted repeal [of the law] and the proposed changes in the regulations told us there was a role for a group to get beyond the politics of the situation," Ms. Zollers added. "It was clear to us that whatever happened, state and local [educators] were going to have a lot of obligations to the handicapped and they would need clear ideas [about how to approach those obligations]."

In the report, the commission recommends that school districts and state agencies establish "more flexible and individual options" in regular programs and develop standards that clearly define which state and local agencies have financial responsibility for related services.

The commission's report also suggests that state and local education officials coordinate their activities so that the financial burden of "unusually expensive" services are shared by cooperating agencies. States, to avoid unnecessary and costly institutional care, should develop community-based residential programs in conjunction with school districts, according to the report.

To reduce legal expenses and at the same time protect procedural safeguards, school districts should adopt "a broad range of dispute-resolution strategies and techniques" that involve the parents of handicapped children, the report states.

In addition, the Congress and the Education Department should target a portion of the current discretionary funds to encourage state and local education agencies to implement the commission's recommendations, according to the report.

The commission members involved in the preparation of the report were: Teresalee Bertinuson, Connecticut state representative; Rosemary Clarke, president of the Nevada State Board of Education; June Gabler, superintendent, Woodhaven, Mich., school district; Henry Marshall, associate superintendent, San Francisco Unified School District; Lorraine McDonnell, social scientist, Rand Corp.; Floretta Dukes McKenzie, superintendent, District of Columbia public schools; and Jean Garvin, special education director, Vermont Department of Education.

Others serving on the panel included Martin Gerry, counsel to the Wednesday Group, U.S. House of Representatives; David Hornbeck, superintendent, Maryland Department of Education; John H. Noble Jr., assistant commissioner, Virginia Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation; Allan Odden, director of policy analysis and research, Education Commission of the States; Richard A. Rossmiller, professor of education,University of Wisconsin; Phillip R. Jones, professor of education,Virginia Polytechnical Institute and State University; John Lancaster, director, Maryland Governor's Office on Coordination of Services to the Handicapped; Joan W. Levy, president, New Trier, Ill., school board; Lisa Walker, assistant director of Institute for Educational Leadership; and Fred Weintraub, assistant executive director for governmental relations, Council of Exceptional Children.

Vol. 02, Issue 27

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >