Basic-Skills Emphasis Said Harmful to Students

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Houston--A nationwide "revolution" in public schools to revise high-school curricula could focus attention on basic skills at the expense of higher learning and the arts, a number of educators meeting here said last week.

Speakers addressing the annual conference of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ascd) sounded a recurring theme: Moves by states and school districts to increase requirements for high-school graduation will not in themselves guarantee that the quality of education will improve.

"Literacy is multi-dimensional," said Maxine Green, professor of philosophy and the social sciences at Columbia University's Teachers College. "There is literacy in aesthetics, in technology," and in other fields, she noted, but in education the focus is only on basic skills.

Teach Students To Think

Ms. Green joined other educators at the four-day conference in urging state lawmakers and local school officials to use care when they revise the curriculum and to maintain classes that teach students to think--not just to repeat information they have memorized.

"We cannot and ought not settle for one-dimensional and functional literacy," she said. "The competition between print and video literacy that bothers some of us doesn't seem to bother educators. I don't think it's bad for students to learn about computers, I just think it's a shame to forget to ask all the other questions."

A focus on "basics," several speakers noted, could have a harmful effect on the educational progress of the bottom 5-to-10 percent of students. Ms. Green said such an emphasis could ultimately prevent those students from advancing their learning to higher levels. "There is a causal relationship between the exclusive emphasis on basics and the erosion of interpretive skills," she said.

But Arthur Lewis of the Universi-ty of Florida at Gainesville, countered that many students may give up "trying to struggle through classes that are too hard for them."

"We will see a tremendous increase in the dropout rate or we may see a subsequent drop in the standard of those courses," Mr. Lewis predicted.

'Watered-Down Versions'

Gordon Cawelti, ascd's executive director, said the new requirements may be "watered-down versions" of the standards imposed in an earlier era. "It couldn't be the physics and chemistry I taught," he said of the new, more stringent requirements being set for high-school students across the country.

O.L. Davis, the organization's president and a professor of education at the University of Texas at Austin, said that increasing graduation requirements might only substitute "quantity for quality."

"Something has gone dreadfully awry," Mr. Davis said "[The regulators] assume higher quality will be brought about by the addition of more courses."

Mr. Davis also criticized the current emphasis on basic skills and the related setting of "so-called minimum competency" standards. "Quality has come to mean minimum," he said, "and minimum requirements have reduced the maximum expectations."

Increase Math Requirements

In addition, the ascd president warned, the nationwide move to increase mathematics and science requirements could curb efforts to teach humanities and the arts. He said school boards hampered by budgetary restraints may hesitate to provide funding for arts and humanities programs while increasing those "technological" requirements deemed necessary by business and industry leaders.

"When we start cutting, those are the kinds of things that will go,'' Mr. Davis said. "We are likely not to pay for humanities and the arts."

Vol. 02, Issue 25

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >