Studies Dispute Coleman's Finding on Blacks in Private Schools

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--Several researchers have developed evidence that they say refutes the findings of sociologist James S. Coleman that minority students perform better academically in private schools than they do in public schools.

Reporting on two separate studies at a recent meeting here of the American Psychological Association, the researchers explained that their analyses of the same data used by Mr. Coleman show that black students enrolled in Catholic schools do not necessarily perform better on achievement tests simply because those schools do a better job of educating, as the controversial sociologist has suggested.

Samuel S. Peng, a researcher at the National Center for Education Statistics (nces), said that achievement scores of sophomore students provide the "best predictor of senior test scores, indicating that what students bring into school initially will greatly impact later outcomes."

His research study, entitled, "Effective High Schools: What Are their Attributes?" concluded that Catholic schools "are not necessarily superior to public schools with respect to student performance after other school characteristics and student background have been taken into account."

Timothy Z. Keith, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Iowa, contends in his study that there is "no difference in achievement" between black students who attend Catholic high schools and those who attend public high schools, when "intellectual ability" is considered along with socioeconomic factors.

'Student Selection'

Mr. Keith concluded that reported differences in achievement among minority students in public and private schools "could be the result of student selection into Catholic schools." Mr. Keith, as a doctoral candidate at Duke University, con-ducted the study with Ellis B. Page of the Duke faculty.

The two research studies appear to contradict the conclusions reached in last year's Coleman study, which drew sharp criticism for its negative implications about the public schools at a time when the Reagan Administration was proposing to offer tuition tax credits to the parents of private-school students.

The Coleman study, Public and Private Schools, contended that the difference in the achievement scores of public- and private-school students indicates that private-school students receive a better education than do public-school students. His conclusion was based on data collected for the nces study, High School and Beyond, the most extensive collection of data ever compiled about American high-school students.

In conducting his research study, Mr. Peng re-analyzed data from the base-year survey of the nces study, which involved more than 30,000 sophomores and 28,000 seniors in 1,015 high schools nationwide.

From those data, Mr. Peng exam-ined the correlation between student achievement and such school characteristics as the number of academic courses offered and the number of students who took them, the amount of time spent on school-related projects, and school discipline.

'Orderly Environment'

According to Mr. Peng, school characteristics "are significant and positively related to student achievement." He said schools that have "an orderly environment and offer an adequate academic program will produce higher-achieving students."

Mr. Keith, in reaching his conclusion, re-analyzed data from the Coleman study and from a study conducted by the sociologist Andrew M. Greeley, both of which reported higher scores among minority students enrolled in private schools.

According to Mr. Keith, those earlier studies considered students' family background in their analyses but failed to consider students' academic ability. When academic ability is "controlled," he said, the differences reported by Mr. Coleman and Mr. Greeley are nonexistent.

Neither Mr. Coleman nor his research associates could be reached for comment last week.

Vol. 02, Issue 01

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >