Letters To The Editor

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

I enjoyed reading "Brownbagging It Means Paying More for Fewer Nutrients" (Aug. 25, 1982). Particularly, I was amused by something I read in the second paragraph: "... a turkey sandwich on a role."

I'll admit I've known some people who have reminded me of turkeys in their roles of student, teacher, administrator, or education critic. What I didn't realize is that you can make sandwiches out of them!

James A. Boytim Assistant Professor Psychology and Education Dickinson College Carlisle, Pa.

Editor's note: We regret our mistake, but we appreciate your rye sense of humor. And we're glad you didn't criticize us ad homonym.

For some, Robert C. Hawley's "A Lesson From Paper Mills, Where the Client Comes First" (Commentary Aug. 18, 1982) may have had appeal, but to the rest of us it revealed a clear lack of understanding of the hierarchy that exists both in the educational sector and in the industrial sector. It is futile to compare the format of industry with that of education.

I have been a teacher for the last 15 years, after spending 27 years in industry. The two areas are worlds apart when one seeks to define a definite path toward evaluation (quality control) and accountability.

I do agree with Mr. Hawley that large measures of time, effort, and expense have been directed toward evaluation, setting objectives, and so forth, all to no avail.

Has any thought been given to the notion that evaluation procedures are fine and that the difficulty lies in our implementation of them? It seems characteristic of our society that, when something doesn't seem to give us the answers that we want to hear, we are ready to change the rules first, rather than examine ourselves to see if we have complied with the initial directives. Mr. Hawley's view that "quality assurance" is better than "teacher evaluation" provides evidence of this behavior. But a rose is a rose no matter what the name. The task is performed as it should be, or it isn't.

Mr. Hawley would place responsibility for ineffective evaluation at the doorstep of the building principal. Mr. Hawley's friend in the paper mill seems to be competent in his role as a quality controller, but a quality controller is not the administrative head of the company. He evaluates a product (a single task); the building principal is responsible for a multitude of duties, and the evaluation of personnel is only one of them.

I am not a principal nor am I an administrator, and I do not speak for them (I doubt that they need my assistance). In effect, I am the "client" of their services. When I entered the classroom, I received more help from building principals than I thought that I needed. That was one of the first errors in my new career. I approached the classroom with the notion that it was simply another work assignment (I, too, thought that education and industry were alike), and my building administrators helped me through the troubled transition that confronted me.

Students, I found, are not like the products in industry, nor are they like those who work in it. Now every teacher knows that, but at the beginning, I didn't. The format that was successful in industry with my subordinates in no way worked in the classroom. For example, one day when a student managed the impossible and did everything wrong, I inadvertantly said, "You are fired." The student looked up at me and retorted, "You can't fire me, Mr. Marsella, you are not in industry any more. You have to show me how not to get fired when I enter industry." The transition between the workplace and the school can be a frightening experience.

With all the assistance that I received from building administrators, I never realized fully what their jobs entailed. I thought that they were there simply to assist me in my new role (how is that for being nave!). Principals seemed to be simply other superiors. But, unlike the quality controller in the paper factory, the principal was responsible for every activity in the building and anything that pertained to it, from instruction to the plant to parents. It is the principal who justifies a failing grade, with our grade book in one hand, to irate parents, long after the teachers have left for the summer.

And teachers have an advantage that those in industry do not; representation by one of their own at termination hearings if they have been accused of being incompetent.

Anyone who suggests that education and industry are alike either has never worked in industry or has forgotten what the conditions were like.

Education provides fascinating and challenging opportunities. Innovation and imaginative approaches to new problems seem commonplace in education when compared with industry. It is one of the few professions in which practitioners are expected to be innovative and to generate and implement new ideas when they won't know for years whether they were successful.

Let us not seek to change our procedures until we examine what part we play in the "ineffectiveness" of the system. And above all, let us not fall prey to the useless exercise of assigning new titles to existing formats. In addition, we should remember that when we compare ourselves with those in other fields, our problems seem small. This may be one reason why, with all the clamor about teacher accountability, none of these efforts seems to leave the ground. The advocates of teacher accountability, rather than proposing new directions that apply to teaching, attempt to use methods that derive from other fields.

There is one similarity that exists between educators and those in the workplace and I am surprised that Mr. Hawley did not address it. Not all in education and industry are accountable--fortunately, the majority are.

William Marsella Instructor, Technical Architecture W. Tresper Clarke High School Westbury, N.Y.

Vol. 02, Issue 01

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >