Chief of Civil-Rights Panel Troubled by Ruling in Title IX Case

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--The chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, in strongly worded letters to the Secretary of Education and the Attorney General, has warned that a recent decision by a federal district judge could be interpreted as exempting local school programs funded under the new federal education block grant from compliance with civil-rights laws protecting the rights of women, the handicapped, and minorities.

Clarence M. Pendleton Jr., chairman of the independent federal commission, said in the letters to Cabinet members Terrel H. Bell and William French Smith that he was concerned that U.S. District Judge D. Dorich Warriner's July 7 ruling in University of Richmond v. Bell might be used as a blueprint to "decimate" regulations governing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

In the Richmond case, Judge Warriner ruled that the Education Department (ed) could not enforce Title IX in an intercollegiate athletic program that receives no direct financial assistance.

But Judge Warriner's ruling, Mr. Pendleton said, "reaches far beyond sex-discrimination prohibitions in athletics." By the judge's logic, he argued, local education programs supported by the federal block grant would be exempt from compliance with civil-rights rules because they would not receive their funds directly from the federal government.

The federal education block grant, known as Chapter II of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act, folded 27 former categorical-aid programs into a single grant to the states. The states are required to pass on at least 80 percent of their federal grant monies to local education agencies, which may use the funds for a variety of purposes, such as law-related education and guid-ance counseling.

On several occasions in the past, Secretary Bell has told the Congress that local education programs funded through Chapter II would be required to comply with all pertinent civil-rights regulations, a point that Mr. Pendleton recognized in his letter. The chief of the civil-rights monitoring agency also said he was troubled by the Richmond ruling because it would curb ed's authority to investigate alleged civil-rights violations.

The ruling, he pointed out, would prohibit ed's office for civil rights from investigating alleged civil-rights violations in education programs "absent a prior showing that such said program or activity is the recipient of direct federal financial assistance."

"Civil-rights enforcement in education thus often will be deterred from the start if the Department has to prove its jurisdiction before collecting evidence," Mr. Pendleton said. "The court's restrictions con-tradict the elementary principle of administrative law that agencies do not have to prove they have jurisdiction before investigating to determine their jurisdiction."

In summary, Mr. Pendleton said, the Richmond ruling, if accepted by ed as proper, "would decimate civil-rights protections in education." Mr. Pendleton asked both Mr. Bell and Mr. Smith to inform him of their agencies' responses to the ruling and to appraise him of their specific positions "on the various issues that it raises."

President Reagan assigned Mr. Pendleton to the chairmanship of the commission late last year after dismissing Arthur S. Flemming from the post. Mr. Flemming had chaired the commission since 1974. Mr. Pendleton, former president of the Urban League of San Diego, was named to replace Mr. Flemming because his views on civil-rights enforcement were widely expected to be consistent with those of the President.

Vol. 01, Issue 41

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >