N.C. To Begin Statewide Evaluation of Teachers, Principals

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The North Carolina State Board of Education has approved a plan to evaluate teachers and principals to be used in all of the state's 143 school districts beginning this year.

State and local officials describe the system as one in which the state will provide descriptions of the major functions of teachers and principals and will leave most of the evaluation process and use of its results up to local districts.

The plan, which was tested in 24 North Carolina districts last year, outlines 33 standards for teachers and 41 for principals that must be used in the evaluation procedures. Local districts have the option of adding additional criteria, but cannot delete any of those provided by the state.

The professional skills in which teachers will be evaluated include planning, giving and overseeing instruction, identifying student strengths and weaknesses, and working well with colleagues. Among the criteria for principals will be leadership ability and administrative and staff-relations skills.

The state will also provide job descriptions for teachers and principals (which districts are not required to use) and evaluation-training sessions for principals.

Principals will evaluate teachers, and superintendents will evaluate principals. Both assessments will be based on a three-, four-, or five-point rating scale devised by the state.

The state will leave the organization of the evaluation process up to the districts, and will not require a "full" evaluation every year.

A "full" evaluation, as described by one superintendent, will consist of an early-fall meeting in which teachers are told what is required of them according to the new state guidelines; subsequent pre- and post-observation conferences; and a final conference preceeding the completion of evaluatory paperwork.

Statewide Evaluation Plan

Two years ago, the North Carolina general assembly directed the state board of education to develop a statewide teacher- and principal-evaluation plan. After a review of other plans in the state and around the country, and a survey of 6,000 North Carolina educators, the North Carolina State Department of Education produced a plan for pilot-testing last year.

Generally, local school officials who participated in the pilot year are satisfied with the system, despite some minor complaints about specific wording in the standards or the rating system.

"But, amazingly, we liked it," said Juanita P. Burns, assistant superintendent of the Shelby City schools, a district initially op-posed to state-mandated standards.

"I guess we weren't jumping up and down for joy when this was announced," she said. "Evaluations have always been a sticky thing. We had tried five instruments before this one came into being."

Some feel that yearly "full" evaluations would be far too time-consuming, said L. Eugene Johnston, assistant superintendent for personnel in the Winston-Salem Forsyth School District.

His district's 2,500 teachers will be given full evaluations every third year, Mr. Johnston said.

William F. Davis, superintendent of Kings Mountain District Schools said that the state system was better than the locally-developed system his district had used.

One weakness, he said, is that the state does not provide guidelines on what constitutes "satisfactory" teachers and principals.

"This will have to be done rather subjectively at the local level," Mr. Davis said.

He and other local officials tend to view the program as a teacher- and principal-improvement program, not as a more expeditious way of recognizing and firing unsatisfactory personnel.

"I doubt seriously whether it will result in more dismissals," he said.

"This is a teacher-improvement program. Weeding out teachers is a minor reason for it," said Mr. Johnston of the Winston-Salem district.

Vol. 01, Issue 41

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >