Special-Ed. Costs Estimated at $10 Billion in 1980-81

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--School districts across the country spent an estimated $10 billion on the education of handicapped students last year, a total that reflected a per-pupil cost more than double that for children enrolled in regular programs.

In the 1977-78 school year, according to data collected for a new U.S. Department of Education (ed) study, the cost of educational and related services for special-education students averaged about $3,577 per child, compared to an average of $1,650 for each nonhandicapped child.

Since then, costs in elementary and secondary education nationwide have increased an estimated 37 percent, according to researchers from the Rand Corporation who conducted the study under a contract with the department. Its statistics, the researchers note in their study--"The Cost of Special Education"--represent the most comprehensive and up-to-date figures available on the subject.

'Special Schools'

Completed in November and released last month, the report confirms that the cost of educating severely handicapped students who attend "special schools" is generally high (an average of $5,352 in 1977-78), while the cost of serving speech-impaired students and those who temporarily receive home instruction ($2,228) is "fairly low."

The report also notes that the annual per-pupil expenditure varied widely depending on the handicapping condition, educational placement, age level, and location of the school district.

School districts spent an average of $2,253--or $603 more than the $1,650 spent on a nonhandicapped child--for each speech-impaired student, according to the report, while the added cost of serving a "functionally blind student" averaged $8,014 over and above the amount allocated for a student in a regular educational program.

Handicapped children who required "itinerant special teachers" were the second most expensive--$5,218--to serve, because of the "one-to-one" teaching involved. The researchers caution, however, that school districts should not consider "mainstreaming" students as a means of cutting costs because such placements are nearly as expensive as full-time special education (an average of $4,733 per mainstreamed student).

Mainstreamed Students

For those students who were mainstreamed into regular classes but who were provided with part-time special-education services, the cost averaged $4,709; educational plans involving special-education classes plus part-time regular classes cost an average of $4,345 per student, according to the report.

The range of costs for special-education programs was also analyzed by age level in the report. For pres-choolers with handicapping conditions, the researchers estimated that school districts spent an average of $3,526.

For elementary-school students the total expense was $3,267, and for secondary-school students it was $4,099.

During 1977, the report noted, more than $7 billion was spent nationwide on special education and such related services as counseling; speech-, occupational-, and physical-therapy programs; psychological and social services; and special vocational services.

"Assuming that both the cost of regular education per pupil and the cost of special education per pupil increased by the same 37-percent rate, then over $10 billion was spent nationwide in the 1980-81 school year for the added cost of special education," the report states. In 1981, the Rand researchers estimate, the average cost of educating a handicapped child was $4,898, $2,638 more than the $2,260 it cost to educate a nonhandicapped child.

Copies of the report can be obtained from the Research Projects Branch of the ed's Office of Special Education, 400 Maryland Avenue S.W., Room 3165, Washington, D.C. 20202.

Vol. 01, Issue 36

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >