Education

School Cases Moving to Federal Courts, Scholars Say

By Mark Walsh — December 04, 1991 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Add this to the list of legal threats facing school officials: an apparent increase in the number of federal lawsuits charging that employees’ or students’ constitutional rights have been violated.

That was the conclusion of several legal scholars at a meeting here late last month of the National Organization on Legal Problems of Education, which drew some 275 school administrators, education lawyers, and professors.

The convention highlighted the breadth of the legal issues that school administrators currently face: lawsuits involving such major policy questions as school finance and educational choice; an increase in special-education litigation; and everyday concerns such as the proper way to search student lockers for drugs.

Public-school officials here indicated they are increasingly concerned about legal challenges to the curriculum and about the numerous issues they face involving religion in the schools.

Now comes the increase in lawsuits filed in the federal courts over issues that in the past might have been tried as common-law torts in the state courts.

Jeffrey R. Horner, a private-practice lawyer in Houston, said more litigants are turning to the federal courts because many states have limited or partial immunity from different types of lawsuits against school districts or their officials.

The most common such suits, sometimes referred to as “constitutional torts,” have been filed under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, which allows for damage awards against government officials who deprive a person of their constitutional rights under “color of state law.”

Section 1983 law is extremely intricate and still evolving, Mr. Homer said.

The complexity of this area was illustrated by two professors who have examined an increase in Section 1983 cases against school districts stemming from sexual abuse of pupils by school personnel.

“This is a major problem for school boards,” said William D. Valente, a law professor at Villanova University. “The potential [lawsuit] targets under federal torts are much broader than under state law. I think we are in for a very rough ride with [Section] 1983.”

Liable for ‘Indifference’

Gail P. Sorenson, an associate professor of educational administration at the State University of New York at Albany, analyzed 51 lawsuits over a recent four-year period involving allegations of sexual abuse of students by teachers, administrators, or other school personnel.

While there were a variety of legal claims raised in the suits--from state torts to federal constitutional questions--the biggest increase has been in claims filed under Section 1983.

The courts have found that school districts generally are not responsible for the misdeeds of their employees, Ms. Serenson said, so “common-law tort situations fail students completely when it comes to sexual abuse.”

This may explain the increase in suits being filed under Section 1983 in federal court, because, she explained, school boards can be found to have violated a person’s rights if they act, or fail to act, “purposefully or with deliberate indifference” in their official policy. One recent case illustrates that school officials may be found liable under Section 1983 for the sexual abuse of students by an employee.

In Stoneking v. Bradford Area School District, a student alleged that action and inaction by school and district officials had fostered her sexual abuse by a school’s band director.

The band director was not a party to the suit. The student sued school administrators charging that they allowed the abuse to continue over a long period of time because they had allegedly received other complaints against the employee regarding sexual abuse.

In 1989, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that school-board policymakers could be held liable under Section 1983 for policies that were “in deliberate indifference to actions taken by their subordinates.” The court held that the principal and assistant principal were not immune from the lawsuit.

The suit was returned for a trial, but the school district later settled the case, Mr. Valente said.

Ms. Sorenson stressed that school districts should view sexual abuse of students not merely as a legal problem, but as an important policy question and devote energies to discussing how to prevent it.

One of the major worries for school officials in this developing area of Section 1983 law is being held liable for inaction, not just for sexual-abuse cases but for other kinds of lawsuits as well.

“The tantalizing problem [for school districts] is where the supervisor does nothing, or he waffles,” said Mr. Valente.

Mr. Homer said that a standard of conduct “amounting to callous or deliberate indifference” is required in most federal judicial circuits for a school board to be found liable for a violation of Section 1983.

He noted that a case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court may further clarify the level of conduct needed to impose Section 1983 liability on school officials.

The case, Collins v. City of Harker Heights (Case No. 90-1279), involves the death of a municipal employee in Texas, but its outcome could have a major impact on whether a school board would be liable if it acted with “deliberate indifference” to a constitutional threat to its employees or students.

The Collins case was argued before the High Court last month, and a decision is expected by next spring. (See Education Week, Nov. 13, 1991.)

Coverage of policy, government and politics, and systems leadership is supported in part a grant from by the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, at www.broadfoundation.org. Education Week retains sole editorial control over the content of this coverage.
A version of this article appeared in the December 04, 1991 edition of Education Week as School Cases Moving to Federal Courts, Scholars Say

Events

Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
Ed-Tech Policy Webinar Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Building a Roadmap for AI Use in Schools
AI in education: game-changer or classroom chaos? Join our webinar & learn how to navigate this evolving tech responsibly.
Education Webinar Developing and Executing Impactful Research Campaigns to Fuel Your Ed Marketing Strategy 
Develop impactful research campaigns to fuel your marketing. Join the EdWeek Research Center for a webinar with actionable take-aways for companies who sell to K-12 districts.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: January 17, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education In Their Own Words The Stories That Stuck With Us, 2023 Edition
Our newsroom selected five stories as among the highlights of our work. Here's why.
4 min read
102523 IMSE Reading BS
Adria Malcolm for Education Week
Education Opinion The 10 Most-Read Opinions of 2023
Here are Education Week’s most-read Opinion blog posts and essays of 2023.
2 min read
Collage of lead images for various opinion stories.
F. Sheehan for Education Week / Getty
Education Letter to the Editor EdWeek's Most-Read Letters of 2023
Read the most-read Letters to the Editor of the past year.
1 min read
Illustration of a line of diverse hands holding up speech bubbles in front of a subtle textured newspaper background
iStock/Getty