In a recent Education Week commentary, Robert E. Slavin writes that the 5-year-old What Works Clearinghouse, designed to provide educators with a central and trusted source of evidence on what works in education reform, has failed to produce information that is scientifically justified or useful.
But the clearinghouse may get a fresh start now that the Mathematica Policy Research Inc. has won the contract to operate the federal endeavor, which is the flagship of the Institute of Education Sciences, argues Mr. Slavin, a co-director of the Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.
What do you think? How can the What Works Clearinghouse provide practitioners with more useful information about education research?
Advertisement
Advertisement
K-12 Industry Solutions
Longitudinal data systems in educationSAS
Guide to Mathematics Intervention SolutionsCarnegie Learning
Doing More with Less: Strategies for SuccessBlackboard K-12
The Case for Online Professional DevelopmentElluminate
Improve Achievement with High-Performance Analysis ToolsGlobalScholar
Performance Measurement: Measuring What Matters MostBaldrige National Quality Program
The Achilles Heel of Education and How to Fix ItAPQC Education
Building 21st Century Skills with Project LearningOracle Education Foundation
View a complete list of archived and upcoming webinars at our event calendar page. Past events include "Making Algebra Easier" and "Quality Counts 2009: Portrait of a Population."
Browse our exclusive directory of more than 200 K-12 professional development products and services.
Advertisement