Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, schools are required to show that all subgroups of students are making adequate yearly progress or risk being deemed "in need of improvement." But determining whether a school should be labeled as such may not be as simple as looking at its academic performance reports, "NewsHour" correspondent John Merrow argues in a recent Education Week Commentary.
The law allows schools and states to blatantly skew their data in several ways, Mr. Merrow writes. For example, schools can use confidence intervals to calculate "hypothetical" test scores, and states can set the definition of academic proficiency as low as they'd like. The result, he says, is reporting that is "virtually useless."
What do you think? Does the NCLB law have too many loopholes? If so, can they be closed without sacrificing fairness?
Advertisement
Advertisement
K-12 Industry Solutions
Longitudinal data systems in educationSAS
Guide to Mathematics Intervention SolutionsCarnegie Learning
Doing More with Less: Strategies for SuccessBlackboard K-12
The Case for Online Professional DevelopmentElluminate
Improve Achievement with High-Performance Analysis ToolsGlobalScholar
Performance Measurement: Measuring What Matters MostBaldrige National Quality Program
The Achilles Heel of Education and How to Fix ItAPQC Education
Building 21st Century Skills with Project LearningOracle Education Foundation
View a complete list of archived and upcoming webinars at our event calendar page. Past events include "Making Algebra Easier" and "Quality Counts 2009: Portrait of a Population."
Browse our exclusive directory of more than 200 K-12 professional development products and services.
Advertisement