Quality Counts 2005: Data Table

Standards and Accountability
Introduction \| Page 1 \| Page 2 \| Page 3 \| Page 4 Page 5 \| Page 6 \| Page 7 \| Page 8 Page 9 \| Page 10 \| Page 11 \| Page 12 How We Graded \| Sources & Notes Excel version \| PDF version ()

Note: A dash (—) indicates data were not available or, in U.S. row, that a total was not appropriate. States are ranked by number grade to the nearest decimal; ties are ranked alphabetically. ¹¹These numbers are preliminary, pending the outcome of appeals, or state has not determined ratings for specific types of schools, such as small schools, high schools, etc. ¹²Column reflects the number of schools identified for improvement based on adequate yearly progress, not Title I schools only.
STATE	SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY -30% OF GRADE
	State holds schools accountable for performance (2004-05)
	Number of schools that did not make adequate yearly progress (2003-04)^11,U	Number of schools identified as needing improvement based on adequate yearly progress (2003-04)^11,12,U
New York	990	713
Louisiana	116	75
Massachusetts	476	381
Ohio	662	487
West Virginia	200	37
Florida	2,349	965
New Mexico	249	124
South Carolina	455	208
Kentucky	288	130
Indiana	438	77
Maryland	277	256
Delaware	44	43
Georgia	416	413
Oklahoma	—	146
Michigan	826	450
California	3,213	1,626
Hawaii	133	138
Illinois	—	694
Tennessee	235	165
New Jersey	944	520
Virginia	460	113
Washington	326	166
Nevada	210	122
Colorado	382	129
Alabama	1,042	83
North Carolina	662	160
Arizona	319	184
Oregon	303	328
Mississippi	210	71
Pennsylvania	566	333
Wisconsin	108	51
Kansas	102	21
Idaho	113	71
South Dakota	159	106
Texas	—	199
Connecticut	187	134
Minnesota	472	48
Utah	142	16
Arkansas	298	305
Missouri	464	132
Maine	132	50
Rhode Island	—	39
Vermont	39	28
Alaska	205	179
North Dakota	45	21
Nebraska	—	—
Wyoming	30	15
Montana	—	40
District of Columbia	117	79
New Hampshire	125	71
Iowa	115	66
U.S.	19,644	11,008

Vol. 24, Issue 17, Pages 89