Published Online:
Published in Print: February 24, 2016, as Disparities in Test Accommodations Eyed
Corrected: February 24, 2016.

Feds Eye Disparities in Supports for SAT, ACT

Student Emily Anderson, foreground, was among those field-testing the Smarter Balanced exam in 2014 at the Blue Mountain Union School in Wells River, Vt. Some students are finding that the accommodations they’re used to getting on tests like this one aren’t always available for college admissions tests.
Student Emily Anderson, foreground, was among those field-testing the Smarter Balanced exam in 2014 at the Blue Mountain Union School in Wells River, Vt. Some students are finding that the accommodations they’re used to getting on tests like this one aren’t always available for college admissions tests.
—Caleb Kenna for Education Week-File

Justice dept. exploring why students with disabilities miss out on supports for required ACTs, SATs

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

As more states embrace the SAT or the ACT as their mandated high school test, a new gulf is opening between students with disabilities and those without, and it's caught the eye of the U.S. Department of Justice.

The department's civil rights division is gathering information about the practices of the College Board and ACT Inc. after persistent complaints that the testing organizations reject many requests for accommodations that are routinely provided by schools, such as extra time or frequent breaks.

That practice puts students with disabilities in a tough spot, particularly in the 23 states that now require high school students to take one of the two college-entrance exams. Students who can't get the testing accommodations they're used to can take the exams without them and risk a compromised performance, or, in some states, they can insist on their usual accommodations and give up a key benefit their non-accommodated peers receive: a "college-reportable" score.

That's because the College Board and ACT Inc. won't certify scores for use in college admissions if their tests aren't taken with accommodations they approved. The organizations defend their practices, and say relatively few students end up with non-reportable scores.

Questions of equal test access are mounting as states push harder than ever to find ways to ensure that students are college-ready. Many states offer the SAT or the ACT for free to all students to expand access to college, so the test cost of $39 to $54 isn't a hurdle to the admissions process.

More recently, states have moved from offering college-admissions tests to requiring them, opening up new challenges of access for students with disabilities or those learning English. Last year, 3.6 million students took those exams. The pressure ramps up further as some states choose to use the SAT or the ACT as their high school test for federal accountability—as the new Every Student Succeeds Act invites them to do—because federal law requires 95 percent of students to be tested.

Sheryl Lazarus, a senior research associate at the National Center on Educational Outcomes, at the University of Minnesota, which studies students with disabilities and English-language learners, said it's "a major concern" that some students are not getting college-reportable scores on their states' mandated SAT or ACT.

"The public thinks that what's happening is that states are helping kids clear a hurdle to college. But, instead, what's happening is many students are not getting the same foothold" as their peers who take a college-entrance exam without accommodations, she said.

'Separate and Unequal'

The story of an 8th grader in Arizona illustrates the painful choices facing some students with disabilities. Her charter school requires students to take a lineup of Advanced Placement courses and exams, and the PSAT and the SAT. For years, the student has received extra time on state tests because of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, which is documented in the educational plan drawn up for her under Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act.

But the College Board rejected her school's application for extra time on her first AP exam, and asked for additional testing to document the disability, according to the girl's father, who declined to be identified for fear of endangering the family's appeal to the College Board.

The school paid more than $2,000 for more tests and resubmitted the request, but the College Board denied it again, and requested more specialized subtests, the father said. After another round of testing, which also cost the school more than $2,000, he said, the College Board denied the request a third time, saying that "in the aggregate, her performance is high enough that she doesn't need accommodations," the father said.

Fearing a low score on her AP report, the girl's family decided she should skip the test. She lost the opportunity to boost her grade point average, as her peers can, by factoring in AP test scores, her father said. And he fears her PSAT and SAT performance will be compromised if the family's appeal isn't granted.

"What was being offered there was separate and unequal," he said.

That story troubles Eve L. Hill, a deputy assistant attorney general with the Justice Department's civil rights division. She said her office receives many reports about students who request accommodations on the SAT or the ACT and encounter "barriers to getting them considered," such as receiving no answer at all, or having to respond to repeated demands for more screening tests or more documentation, and then often having their requests denied or only partially granted.

Focusing on Legal Mandates

Those kinds of problems led the Justice Department to create a new "technical assistance" document in September, highlighting the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act and its regulations that ensure students equal access to a fair testing environment, for any test that governs high school, college, or graduate school admissions, as well as licensing or professional exams.

In partnership with the U.S. Department of Education, the Justice Department took the unusual step of inviting K-12 state leaders who oversee assessment and special education to listen to a webinar in December that detailed those ADA provisions.

Ms. Hill declined to say whether the Justice Department is planning to file suit against one or more testing companies. But such action is one of the department's options. It intervened in a California case against the Law School Admission Council, which administers the LSAT, and helped bring about a 2014 settlement of claims that test-takers had trouble getting accommodations or that their scores were "flagged" in ways that disadvantaged them in law school admissions.

For now, the Justice Department is asking schools, districts, and states to submit reports of inappropriate denials of testing accommodations through its online complaint form.

"When a testing company demands unnecessary documentation, denies accommodations without a really good reason," or doesn't administer tests in a way that "best ensures" that scores reflect students' knowledge and skill, rather than their disabilities—a key tenet in ADA regulations—it's "potentially an ADA violation," Hill said in an interview.

The fact that some students emerge from a state-required ACT or SAT administration without a college-reportable score could run afoul of another provision of ADA regulations, which says that in contracting, states may not "afford a qualified individual with a disability an opportunity to participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service that is not equal to that afforded others."

Difficulty obtaining accommodations on the SAT or the ACT is an issue that's rising on states' radars as they push more students to take those tests. State assessment directors have been airing their concerns about it at nationwide gatherings with colleagues, and federal education officials have at times attended those meetings or called in to hear such concerns.

Some assessment leaders are uneasy about using the college-entrance exams for accountability because of fairness questions.

"One of the questions is: Is it valid to penalize a school for results when some students who are used to certain accommodations took the test without them?" said Marianne Perie, the director of the University of Kansas' Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation, which designs testing systems for states.

Deb Lindsey, the assessment director in Wyoming, which requires all students to take the ACT and plans to use it for accountability, said she has been pushing ACT Inc. hard to allow school-based teams to be the arbiters of accommodations on that test, the same way they are for classroom and state testing accommodations. They're the ones who know the students best, she said.

Lindsey said she'd like to see "a day when there would not be an ACT panel that reviewed the appropriateness of student accommodations requests."

A Role for States?

Some state testing leaders are increasingly uneasy about the role their state policies play in students' difficult choices. Michael Hock, Vermont's assessment director, said that testing companies create the problem by rejecting many of the accommodations that states and districts permit on their own tests.

But states that mandate the SAT or the ACT, knowing some students might not get a college-reportable score, contribute to the problem, too, he said.

"I think states share some culpability here because they're willing to go along with it," Hock said. "It completely disregards the needs of the student."

Joseph Martineau, who oversaw testing in Michigan for eight years before joining the Center for Assessment, which consults with states on testing issues, said he was troubled watching the parents of students with disabilities struggle to choose between encouraging their children to take the state-required ACT without the accommodations they'd been used to, or take it with them and sacrifice a college-reportable score.

It bothers him, too, that being an English-learner is not, by itself, grounds for accommodations on the test.

"It was frustrating," he said. "I always felt we were not doing right by the kids, and that our hands were tied. It never felt right because some students weren't getting equal opportunity" to show how they could perform on the entrance exam, or to use the scores the same way as their non-accommodated peers, he said.

Who Decides?

In general, states allow a greater variety of accommodations on their tests than do the private testing companies, experts said. If a student's 504 plan or individualized education program specifies them, they can easily obtain supports such as Braille, a human reader or signer, use of a calculator, and text-to-speech conversions. Additional time, though, is among the most commonly requested accommodations.

Students don't have to request extended time on the Smarter Balanced exam, since it's untimed. They must request it on the PARCC exam, and on many state tests that are timed. Accommodations for those tests, as for any state test, are granted by school-based IEP teams, and are routinely granted if a need is specified in the student's IEP or 504 plan.

But in shifting to private testing companies for high school tests, decisions about accommodations are made at those companies' discretion.

Of the 11th graders in the class of 2016 who took the ACT in states that required it, 11,200 students got scores that weren't college-reportable, according to the ACT. On the SAT, no students got non-reportable scores in 2014-15 because no state that mandates the SAT permitted accommodations not approved by the College Board, spokeswoman Kate Levin said. In 2013-14, one state, Maine, did, and 125 students got non-reportable scores, she said.

ACT Inc. and the College Board said their practices on test accommodations are necessary to protect the validity and reliability of the scores. The College Board said it approves 85 percent of its accommodations requests; ACT said it approves 92 percent. Both said they've reviewed their accommodations practices and concluded that they conform to the Justice Department's guidelines.

Requests for accommodations on the two exams are turned down most often for reasons such as failing to identify a disability, presenting no evidence that accommodations are needed, requesting inappropriate accommodations (such as asking to review the test in advance), or lacking a parent's signature, the two organizations said.

Levin said that the few students who don't obtain a college-reportable score get other benefits, such as free online practice resources, score reports that detail their strengths and weaknesses, and college-planning information. Paul Weeks, the senior vice president for client relations at ACT, acknowledged that it is more difficult to secure accommodations for the ACT than it is for state tests, but said that "the difficulty is a lot less than people think."

'A Delicate Balance'

Still, he said, ACT Inc. is constantly reviewing its accommodations practices as it tries to help states provide the testing programs they wish to offer, with maximum participation.

"It's a delicate balance between meeting states' needs, and students' needs, and ensuring validity and reliability in the scores we provide to colleges," Weeks said.

Maine has required students to take the SAT for a decade, and its assessment director, Charlene Tucker, views the program's benefits as far outweighing its drawbacks. It gets more students thinking about college, she said, and it provides valuable reports to parents, and to schools, that help shape planning and instruction. A college-reportable score "is an extra bonus" that most students get, Tucker said.

Some schools might be limiting the range of accommodations they provide in day-to-day practice, andrequest on the SAT or the ACT, in anticipation of those companies' approval patterns.

Michigan recently switched to the SAT after years of requiring the ACT. Laurie Vanderploeg, who oversees special education services to 14,000 students in 20 districts around Grand Rapids, said schools in her area haven't had many accommodations requests rejected.

She said that could be because "we tried to anticipate the accommodations" that ACT typically provided, to keep them consistent across a student's school years and "to avoid putting a kid at risk of a non-reportable score." But she acknowledged that anticipating the accommodations ACT would likely provide "may have" shortchanged students who needed other kinds of supports.

Connecticut was concerned enough about the College Board's accommodations policies that it pressured the organization to expand available accommodations as part of that state's recent decision to require the college-entrance exam for all students.

Related Blog

Commissioner of Education Dianna R. Wentzell said in an interview that her state's legal and special education teams consulted with the Justice Department to be sure Connecticut was on solid footing in its accommodations requests as it negotiated an agreement with the College Board.

She said she's "very impressed" that the College Board was open to the shift, and that the board is going to use its work with Connecticut to study the impact, if any, of greater accessibility on the validity of exam scores.

There will still be Connecticut students whose accommodations aren't approved for the SAT and who won't get college-reportable scores, Wentzell said, but the change will minimize that number and make the SAT "available to more students."

Vol. 35, Issue 22, Pages 1,14-15

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Correction: 
An earlier version of this story included an incorrect name for the U.S. Department of Justice's civil rights division.

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented