Published Online: January 26, 2016
Published in Print: January 27, 2016, as Discussions of High-Stakes Testing Should Include International Tests


Discussions of High-Stakes Testing Should Include International Tests

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Educational testing is inherently flawed. No written assessment can do justice to the breadth and depth of students' intellectual, social, and emotional competencies. As educators clamor to condemn high-stakes tests and implement the changes that the Every Student Succeeds Act will enable, it is important that educators also impose the same scrutiny on international assessments.

Comparison tests such as the Program for International Student Assessment are gaining in status on the basis that they measure higher-order cognitive skills. These assessments have triggered a global discourse around standards in education and have given visibility to some of the core failings of education systems that might otherwise have been lauded by educators and policymakers as being successful. Yet the creators of such assessments do the education community little favor when they offer simplistic interpretations of the resulting test data.

Consider, for example, the way in which PISA results have been used to evaluate ed-tech implementations. Last fall, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development published its findings based on PISA data on the impact of computers on student learning. Of course, mainstream news outlets have little appetite for the subtleties of 200-page reports, and so the coverage focused instead on the sound bite offered by PISA: Computers "do not improve" pupil results, according to the BBC.

Sweeping generalizations rarely hold true in education, and PISA's headline-grabbing claim, picked up by the BBC and other media outlets, is not without a sense of irony.

To assume the fidelity of international-test results without question is to fall victim to the same kinds of simplistic assumptions that have dogged technology implementations. Parents and teachers deserve nuance in the analysis of test scores. As educators we should always demand such nuance; not even international assessments should be exempt.

Junaid Mubeen
Head of Product
Whizz Education
Seattle, Wash.

Vol. 35, Issue 19, Page 26

Related Stories
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories