Published Online: November 12, 2013
Published in Print: November 13, 2013, as Private Competition Helps, Not Hurts, U.S. Education

Letter

Private Competition Helps, Not Hurts, U.S. Education

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Diane Ravitch's argument that all taxes and donations be invested in public schools only, disfavoring competition or markets, sounds like organizational models in Communist countries ("Ravitch: Private Sector Should Provide Help, Not Competition for Public Schools," Marketplace K-12 blog, Oct. 18, 2013).

Would Ms. Ravitch favor the elimination of markets in food distribution? Would the food, prices, or service be better if there were no other choices for food than what the government ordained? On her claim that private or charter schools will eventually ruin public education, have private, for-profit mental-health agencies ruined their tax-supported counterparts?

On the civic virtues perpetuated in public schools, Education Week should publish the results of more than a few surveys that show that graduates of nongovernment schools participate in the public arena (volunteering, voting, running for office) at greater rates than their public school counterparts.

Education should be in the hands of parents, with government providing need-based scholarships so that the poorest can exercise a real choice in their children's education.

Dan Vander Ark
Curriculum Director
NorthPointe Christian Schools
Grand Rapids, Mich.

Vol. 33, Issue 12, Page 24

Related Stories
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented