Published Online: September 13, 2011
Published in Print: September 14, 2011, as Standards Could Repeat Failed History in Education


Standards Could Repeat Failed History in Education

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

While virtually all educators and policymakers support teaching to high standards, the article "Standards Writers Wade Into Curriculum" and the Commentary in the same issue titled "In Common Core, Little to Cheer About" (Education Week, Aug. 10, 2011) make me fear that the common-core standards for English/language arts will become this decade's No Child Left Behind policy.

Under the principles of NCLB's Reading First program, scripted instruction created by mega-publishing companies failed to make a significant impact on reading comprehension.

Now, publishing companies like Houghton Mifflin Harcourt are embracing the "publishing criteria" for common-core standards because these guidelines give them the go-ahead to create the next iteration of programs that will inevitably mandate specific texts, instructional methods, teacher-directed questions, and assigned written responses.

It is no surprise that district leaders also support these guidelines because they provide a rationale to purchase "teacher proof" programs that eliminate the need to fund professional development. The "program" approach disregards the body of research that shows it is the knowledge and skill of the teacher that make the greatest impact on motivation, engagement, and increased reading achievement for all students.

In addition, the Aug. 10 Commentary reports that the common-core standards "do not represent a meaningful improvement over existing state standards," and that initial work to create new tests is not significantly changing current high-stakes tests. Sadly, we are re-creating our failed history.

Teach to high standards? Of course. But, let's use the research to support professional development of teachers, rather than publish lists of standards, create programs that script instruction to address those standards, and use high-stakes tests to evaluate both students and teachers.

Michael L. Shaw
Professor of Literacy Education
St. Thomas Aquinas College
Sparkill, N.Y.

Vol. 31, Issue 03, Page 26

Related Stories
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories