Published Online: November 2, 2010
Published in Print: November 3, 2010, as Vouchers Proposed for Disabled Pupils in Military Homes

Vouchers Proposed for Disabled Pupils in Military Homes

As his mother, Karen Driscoll, left, looks on, Paul Driscoll, a 12-year-old with autism, takes a break after getting overstimulated during playtime. Behavior challenges, a symptom of autism, affect an individual's ability to function in all areas of life.
—Sandy Huffaker for Education Week

A proposed $5 million voucher programRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader for military families that have children with special education needs is part of the defense-spending bill that Congress will take up in its post-election lame-duck session.

The pilot program would provide up to $7,500 per year for school costs. The U.S. Department of Defense would be required to evaluate the success of the program in a report to be completed no later than 2015.

The pilot program is only one of several provisions tucked into the $726 billion defense bill that are intended to improve schooling for military children who require special education services. The proposed amendment, which was sponsored by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., would also direct the secretaries of defense and education to collaborate on issues such as expedited due process resolution for military families, creation of individualized education programs that are applicable across state lines, and establishment of a complaint system for military families.

Some of these issues, like “portable” IEPs, are already a part of the current Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Likewise, a commission of state officials two years ago formed the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children, which has a section specific to special education and has been enacted by 34 states so far.

About 100,000 active-duty and reserve service members have dependents with special needs, including spouses, children, and dependent parents. But military families say the current regulations don’t work well for parents and children who are constantly on the move. Families are told that certain services they were used to in one district can’t be implemented in another, according to supporters of the amendment. And due process hearings often aren’t resolved before the family is transferred to another duty station.

Different Supports

That was the experience of Sheri Dyas Mellott, whose husband is a commander in the U.S. Navy. She has a 14-year-old and a 6-year-old who have autism spectrum disorders, and an 11-year-old with an eye disorder. The children have attended nine different school districts in five different states, she said.

During one dispute, which took place while the family was stationed at Naval Air Station Lemoore, in central California, the Mellotts paid $80,000 to bring in specialists to observe their oldest child and to advocate on his behalf during due process hearings. “We had no help from the military,” Ms. Mellott said. “We were completely on our own.”

Eventually, her husband left the Navy and the family settled in State College, Pa., so that their children could receive adequate services, she said.

“If we had a fight [as an officer’s family], can you imagine what the young enlisted guys have to go through?” she said. Karen Driscoll, who has a 12-year-old son with autism, experienced a similar dispute when the family moved to San Diego in 2008. When her son was enrolled in Fairfax County, Va., schools, he was receiving 21 hours of aide support a week. In California, the district told her that it would provide 10 hours a week.

Marines Intervene

Unlike Ms. Dyas, Ms. Driscoll had the support of a caseworker and a special-education lawyer who is contracted through the U.S. Marine Corps to provide support to families. Ms. Driscoll and other parents have lobbied Congress and military officials to provide more support to families. In her case, once the lawyer got involved, her son got the full-time aide and other services comparable to what he had received at his other school.

Paul Driscoll, a 12-year-old with autism, builds a bridge out of blocks during a home-therapy session in San Diego. A proposed $5 million pilot program would provide private school tuition vouchers for children with disabilities from military families.
—Sandy Huffaker for Education Week

“We needed some tools, legal assistance, and quite frankly, the Marine Corps standing behind us,” Ms. Driscoll said.

Ms. Driscoll said she favors vouchers because they offer families an option. The voucher amount of $7,500 “is inadequate, but it makes a difference.”

All military service members who have family members with special needs are required to enroll in the Exceptional Family Member Program, which is intended to ensure they are not sent to postings where their needs cannot be met.

However, the family-support function that is part of the program is voluntary, and services available to families can vary depending on the service branch.

The idea of a voucher for military families, however, has been met with stiff resistance from some education groups. “Federal dollars should go to public schools,” said Mary Kusler, the manager of federal advocacy for the Washington-based National Education Association, a teachers union. She added that the federal government has underfunded special education for years, and parents who accept such vouchers would be walking away from guaranteed rights under the IDEA.

Richard Schulte, the superintendent of the 5,500-student Oak Harbor district in Washington state, also opposes the voucher, though he said he recognizes that families may be receiving different levels of services as they move. In his district, about 3,600 students are military dependents from families based nearby at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

But a voucher worth $7,500 is not going to pay for a program to support the needs of a child with intensive educational needs, he said. For example, a student with autism may cost the district $10,000 to $50,000 to educate, he said.

“There aren’t other providers for them to go to,” he said.

Vol. 30, Issue 10, Pages 19-20

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories