Tough Times Ahead for Children of the Great Recession, Report Finds
Schools Offering Fewer Resources as Poverty Rises
More children will live in poverty this year. More will have two parents who are unemployed. Fewer children will enroll in prekindergarten programs, and fewer teenagers will find jobs. More children are likely to commit suicide, be overweight, and be victimized by crime.
These are the children of the Great Recession, a cohort that will experience a decline in fortunes that erases 30 years of social progress, contends a report released last week by the Foundation for Child Development.
Known as the Child and Youth Well-Being Index, the report measures the impact of the recession on the current generation. It predicts that in the next few years, the economy may recover and the unemployment rate may drop, but the generation growing up now could feel the harsh impact of the recession for years to come.
“These are the lasting impacts of extreme recessions,” said Kenneth Land, a professor of sociology and demography at Duke University and the author of the report.
The Foundation for Child Development, a national, private philanthropy based in New York, has tracked a combination of indicators ranging from childhood obesity to teenage births since 1975. The current report predicts that the number of children living in poverty will rise to 15.6 million in 2010, an increase of more than 3 million children in four years. More than a quarter of American children will live in families where both parents don’t have full-time jobs, up from 22 percent in 2006. As many as half a million children could become homeless, up from 330,000 in 2007.
Schools Hit Hard
The decline in overall child well-being comes after several years of improvement driven largely by declining rates of crime, drinking, and drug use, according to the report, which includes data from the U.S. Census, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Center for Education Statistics.
Schools will be hit particularly hard by the aftershocks, Mr. Land said. As more families enter the ranks of the poor, more children will arrive at school behind their wealthier peers, yet fewer will have the benefit of high-quality early education to help them catch up. The children who miss out on prekindergarten now will likely have lower reading and math scores when they enter 4th grade, the report says. In another decade, they’ll be more likely to drop out of high school.
“If you trace out those cohort effects, kids who don’t get good schooling early in life typically score less well on standardized tests later. They have a more difficult time staying attached to school,” Mr. Land said.
In addition, the uncertain future of the recession generation could challenge education reform goals for local school districts and the Obama administration’s drive to make American students more globally competitive. Already, U.S. students trail their peers in many developed countries on most measures of child well-being. American children were last or close to last in terms of family income, parental employment, safety, health, and family relationships compared with 20 other developed nations, according to a 2007 UNICEF report. They were also close to the bottom in educational achievement.
Curtis Skinner, the director of family economic security at the National Center for Children in Poverty, at Columbia University in New York City, said he’s seen similar trends in his own research.
“We can expect more of these problems down the road,” he said.
The widespread concerns come at a time when early-education programs have been struggling to serve all the children who qualify for them, with expansion in 2009 slower and more uneven than in previous years, according to the National Institute for Early Education Research, at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J.
One District’s Story
Children in New Jersey’s Perth-Amboy public schools are already dealing with an array of recession-related consequences, said John Rodecker, the superintendent.
The 10,500-student school district, in a poor city with a large population of newly arrived immigrants, worked hard to get off the “in need of improvement” list under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. Now, state funding cuts have forced Mr. Rodecker to lay off staff members and trim programs, and he worries that other, subtler effects could erase the district’s recent gains.
“The economy in general has had an impact on the city we’re located in and on families,” Mr. Rodecker said. “It can’t help but impact the weight on the child’s shoulders while they’re in school. They face challenges in good times. To add further economic stress to the family unit tends to wear them down.”
Sanders Korenman, a professor in Baruch College’s school of public affairs and a senior economist for labor, welfare, and education under President Bill Clinton, cautioned that there’s still not enough data to assume today’s children will suffer long-term problems.
“I don’t think that we know enough about what this recession has brought,” he said.
Vol. 29, Issue 35, Pages 14-15