Published Online: June 12, 2009
Published in Print: June 17, 2009, as Hire Full-Time Mentors, In Lieu of Merit Pay

Letter

Hire Full-Time Mentors, in Lieu of Merit Pay

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Your article “Grade Inflation Seen in Evaluations of Teachers, Regardless of System” (June 10, 2009) is a balanced presentation of conflicting concepts related to teacher assessment.

Why don’t evaluation systems work? To start, many use the same process both to dismiss and to improve teachers. That should not be done, but many do it anyway.

Moreover, most evaluation processes fail to improve teaching in the same way that teaching fails to improve student learning. Those being “improved” are not actively engaged in their own betterment. Threats, rewards, and incentives say two things: either that one is too lazy to do what’s good, or that one doesn’t know what’s good. But professionals who resist a new idea aren’t necessarily lazy. Whipping them into conformity may correct their behavior, but at a cost. On the other hand, if teachers truly don’t know what’s good, then all the incentives (and all the king’s horses and all the king’s men) won’t make them better.

A paralyzed man once called upon a famous healer to carry him to a pool reputed to have healing powers. Before helping him, however, the healer asked, “Do you want to get well?” Likewise, before evaluators can improve teachers, they must ask a similar question: “Do you want to become a good or a great teacher?” Evaluators can’t drive skill-paralyzed educators with whips or lure them with rewards into the healing pool and expect them to come out walking. First, teachers must want to walk.

Districts might fare better by confronting teachers with the right question. They might help more by looking at the research and by showing teachers what works. Simply demanding that Humpty Dumpty climb over the wall, or else, isn’t good enough.

With a fraction of the money currently squandered on standardized testing, this nation could hire effective teachers as full-time mentors at all levels and in all public schools. That would produce far more improvement in teaching and learning than will ever come from a pay-for-performance plan.

Bill Harshbarger
Arcola, Ill.

Vol. 28, Issue 35, Page 32

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login |  Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Commented