States Weigh Plans to Address Educator Sexual Abuse

Policymakers respond to national and local media coverage of misconduct.

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Heeding a steady drumbeat of sexual-misconduct cases involving teachers, at least 15 states are now considering stronger oversight and tougher punishment for educators who abuse their students.

Lawmakers say they are concerned about an increasingly well-documented phenomenon: While the vast majority of America’s teachers are committed professionals, there also is a persistent problem with sexual misconduct in U.S. schools. When abuse happens, administrators too often fail to let others know about it, and too many legal loopholes let offenders stay in the classroom.

Advocates include governors, education superintendents, and legislative leaders.

“We’ve got to be on a bully pulpit with our school districts,” said Missouri state Rep. Jane Cunningham. The Republican’s legislation would eliminate statutes of limitation for sexual misconduct, allowing victims to come forward and bring charges against abusers no matter how many years had passed since the crime.

The ideas emerging in state capitals come as U.S. media have been reporting steadily on individual cases, along with more in-depth examinations of the problem.

A nationwide Associated Press investigation published in October found 2,570 educators whose teaching credentials were revoked, denied, surrendered or sanctioned from 2001 through 2005 after sexual-misconduct allegations.

Young people were the victims in at least 1,801 of the cases, and more than 80 percent of those were students.

Experts who track sexual abuse say those cases reflect a deeper problem because of underreporting. There are roughly 3 million public school teachers nationwide.

In eight states, leaders pushing changes said the AP investigation had inspired their proposals. Others said they had grown concerned from individual cases of abuse in their states, or other news reports that looked at the problem locally or in their state.

In New York, Gov. Eliot Spitzer, a Democrat, supports automatic suspension of teachers convicted of sex crimes, which now requires lengthy hearings. In Maine, Gov. John Baldacci, a Democrat, hopes to share the names of abusive teachers with other states, which a 1913 confidentiality law there prohibits. In Florida, Gov. Charlie Crist endorsed federal legislation proposed by U.S. Rep. Adam Putnam, a fellow Florida Republican, to create a national databank of abusive teachers, a hotline for complaints, and federal funds for state investigators.

Tougher Penalties

Some states, such as Indiana, Massachusetts, and Utah, are looking to increase penalties, expand background checks, or broaden their ability to police charter schools for abuse. Kentucky and South Carolina are considering making it illegal for teachers to have sex with older students.

Several states are tackling a major problem—the loopholes that allow teachers with a history of abuse to move from one school district to another, or from one state to another. What education officials commonly call “passing the trash” happens when districts allow a teacher to quietly leave a school, fail to report problems to state authorities, or fail to check with state authorities before hiring a teacher, among other reasons.

In eight states, legislators are pursuing changes to close those gaps, including California, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, Virginia, Washington state, and West Virginia.

“Despite acts of misconduct that were threatening and dangerous in schools, there is a track record of people going on to another school district and finding employment,” said Missouri state Senate President Pro Tem Michael Gibbons. “The new school district may get the truth, but they don’t get the whole truth about this person’s background. They may find out the dates of service, they may find out this person was dismissed, but there really is no other information forthcoming.”

His legislation aims to get school employees and districts to share all information about job-hunting teachers, including whether those educators sexually abused their students, by granting administrators civil immunity from lawsuits.

In the Missouri House, a committee considering Rep. Cunningham’s draft legislation last week began weighing an amendment that would ban teachers from allowing students to see their private Web pages, such as those on on the social-networking Web sites Facebook and MySpace.

Under the proposal, only those teachers who require a password or permission for others to view their online profiles would be restricted from letting students they had taught within the last two years see their sites. Web pages without restrictions would continue to be available.

The House education committee did not vote last week on the provision or the overall legislation, but Ms.Cunningham said she planned to take a vote this week.

Diverse Approaches

Other states approach the same problem differently. A Colorado measure being drafted would penalize school districts and state officials that fail to report problem teachers, while a West Virginia proposal would open school officials themselves to punishment. Florida would bar any confidentiality agreement between districts and teachers, and require districts to report every firing to the state.

In California, one proposal would close a loophole that bars the teacher-credentialing commission from revealing the reason teachers lose their licenses if they plead no contest to an offense.

Special Collection

Read more about this series, "A Lingering Shame: Sexual Abuse of Students by School Employees." The collection includes an Associated Press series on the issue, as well as special Education Week coverage.

Under no-contest pleas, defendants are punished as if they pleaded guilty, but retain the right to challenge the charges against them in lawsuits and other proceedings. Such deals have meant public records were unclear about why educator licenses were sanctioned in dozens of cases, the AP found.

“You should not be able to plead no contest to a sex offense just so you can continue teaching,” said state Sen. Bob Margett. The measure means teachers who plead no contest would immediately lose their licenses, and the reason for the revocation would be public.

Some say the latest legislation is just the beginning.

South Carolina has created a new committee of parents, teachers, social workers, and prosecutors to study the problem and come back with new ideas.

Though small statistically, the number of abusive teachers is too high, South Carolina Education Superintendent Jim Rex wrote after reading the AP report.

“I am nonetheless outraged by any incident in which an adult entrusted with the care of one of South Carolina’s students violates that student. The ramifications for that student, his or her family, and the community as a whole are painful and long-lasting,” he wrote.

In Utah, the numbers of abuses flat-out shocked state Rep. Carl Wimmer. “These things happen a lot more often than parents would think,” he said.

Vol. 27, Issue 22, Page 16

Published in Print: February 6, 2008, as States Weigh Plans to Address Educator Sexual Abuse
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories