Published Online: November 9, 2004
Published in Print: November 10, 2004, as ‘No Child’ Law Dismisses Teaching’s Noble Calling


‘No Child’ Law Dismisses Teaching’s Noble Calling

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

Thanks to Robert J. Sternberg for his Commentary "Good Intentions, Bad Results" (Oct. 27, 2004), in which he lists a dozen reasons the No Child Left Behind Act is failing our schools. Here’s reason No. 13 to add to his list:

This federal law dumbs down the field of education and nullifies the profession by assuming that educators/teachers are (a) ignorant about children and learning and incapable of self-education; (b) self-serving and incapable of self-development; (c) incompetent and incapable of self-governance and self-organization; and (d) lazy and incapable of self-motivation.

Even if—let’s be generous— 10 percent of all teachers are incorrigible, why create a law that assumes 100 percent bad apples? The No Child Left Behind Act never considers that teaching is a noble calling.

Joan Jaeckel
Project Director
Communities Educated, Empowered,
and Democratic (CEED)
Studio City, Calif.

Vol. 24, Issue 11, Page 37

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories